Evolution is now A FACT OF LIFE

[chad_tukes]

---

The ID is part of EVOLUTION...it EVOLVES too!

what do you mean by that sir?

[chad_tukes]

"Enough with all your inquisitive questions! The ID did it. Period."

^ basically sums up my view of creationism

precisely the reason why creationism doesn't make sense!

[kebotDiNaMute]

i wouldn't call it FAITH, i'd call it confidence. you have to choose words carefully because when you say it's faith---you'd put a religious touch into it which obviously is not the case with evolution. it's purely scientific. you find a fossil, you gather data, you solve a huge puzzle, that means the missing data is out there; it just hasn't been found. your theory, on the other hand, does not have anything to start with... so why bother?

i'd call it confidence
--- confidence + uncertainty = faith

[kebotDiNaMute]

i agree, all theories are questionable that's why they're called theories. creationists are gonna ask us "well, everything's gotta have to come from something". our answer to that would be "we do not know that something YET"---so we formulate theories.

creationists would rather have an "answer" with absolutely NO SUPPORT then to have to do some work and find out for ourselves. laziness? hmmm...

well, everything's gotta have to come from something". our answer to that would be "we do not know that something YET
--- your creationist man diay.. hahaha! we creationist say we don't know how he made it... so we also formulate theories... hahaha! omg.
--- why insist your evolution is true, "we do not know that something YET"
--- ka alegre sa imo post chad. cge ko katawa...

[chad_tukes]

well, everything's gotta have to come from something". our answer to that would be "we do not know that something YET
--- your creationist man diay.. hahaha! we creationist say we don't know how he made it... so we also formulate theories... hahaha! omg.
--- why insist your evolution is true, "we do not know that something YET"
--- ka alegre sa imo post chad. cge ko katawa...

oh em gee... sorry kebs, i won't ever be a creationist. kebot thinks i'm too good so he wants to recruit me to his camp. sorry kebs, i'm too valuable for that.

creationist already know the answer as to where we all came from, correct? GOD.

[brownprose]

@schmuck and chad

ID is a claim of creationists to support the literal/biblical fiats of creation. The use of the term is more of a packaging with some adornments of alleged scientific backing (although mostly unproven) to appeal to the everyday joe.

Theistic evolution (for which I am also among the subscribers) holds that the theist's acceptance of evolutionary biology is not fundamentally different from the acceptance of other sciences. Boldly speaking, it also begins with a methodological assumption of naturalism to study and explain the natural world, without yet assuming the existence or nonexistence of the supernatural. What bridges the science of evolution and the belief that someone is responsible for it (evolution) can only be explained philosophically through teleology (study of design and purpose). Here, we believe all things are designed for or directed toward a final result -- that there is an inherent purpose or final cause for all that exists.

[kebotDiNaMute]

oh em gee... sorry kebs, i won't ever be a creationist. kebot thinks i'm too good so he wants to recruit me to his camp. sorry kebs, i'm too valuable for that.

creationist already know the answer as to where we all came from, correct? GOD.

kebot thinks i'm too good so he wants to recruit me to his camp. sorry kebs, i'm too valuable for that
--- aw, i would rather not say that... im no agency for maid/boy recruitment... careful with those... bsin ma scam... hahaha!

creationist already know the answer as to where we all came from, correct? GOD
--- to be specific, its clay/dust/mud... created by the hand of God. We have answers... evo not yet.

[kebotDiNaMute]

@schmuck and chad

ID is a claim of creationists to support the literal/biblical fiats of creation. The use of the term is more of a packaging with some adornments of alleged scientific backing (although mostly unproven) to appeal to the everyday joe.

Theistic evolution (for which I am also among the subscribers) holds that the theist's acceptance of evolutionary biology is not fundamentally different from the acceptance of other sciences. Boldly speaking, it also begins with a methodological assumption of naturalism to study and explain the natural world, without yet assuming the existence or nonexistence of the supernatural. What bridges the science of evolution and the belief that someone is responsible for it (evolution) can only be explained philosophically through teleology (study of design and purpose). Here, we believe all things are designed for or directed toward a final result -- that there is an inherent purpose or final cause for all that exists.

although mostly unproven
--- science cannot test god. its just a limitation. Mostly unproven, well they were written 2000 years ago, and we had the opportunity to affirm it, and yes we did... by the way there was no science at that time... how did they know? how can they claim such bold ideas...

[schmuck]

@schmuck and chad

ID is a claim of creationists to support the literal/biblical fiats of creation. The use of the term is more of a packaging with some adornments of alleged scientific backing (although mostly unproven) to appeal to the everyday joe.

Theistic evolution (for which I am also among the subscribers) holds that the theist's acceptance of evolutionary biology is not fundamentally different from the acceptance of other sciences. Boldly speaking, it also begins with a methodological assumption of naturalism to study and explain the natural world, without yet assuming the existence or nonexistence of the supernatural. What bridges the science of evolution and the belief that someone is responsible for it (evolution) can only be explained philosophically through teleology (study of design and purpose). Here, we believe all things are designed for or directed toward a final result -- that there is an inherent purpose or final cause for all that exists.

theistic evolution pero without yet assuming the existence or nonexistence of the supernatural.

hmmm

[jamesmusslewhite]

you HAVE NOT worked for NASA for years? i thought you did, James. you even posted it here in the forum on AUGUST 28, 2009---so which lie are we supposed to believe James? let me quote what you posted:

If you also check my posts you will find that I had posted previously; that I had quite biology, stopped working for NASA and choose to start my own business focusing on botany. Post#481 while responding to "Maiic" and Post#747 responding to one of your Post. So where have I lied to you? And what gives you the right to call me a lier?

I love how you are quick to call other people a lier. I hear do not insult a Philippine male he may get his little feelings hurt, But I get routinely insulted on this forum. Sorry but were I come from you call a man a lier that is like sticking up your middle finger in his face. I guess you people here in the Philippines have so many people lie, that you no longer understand the concept of honor and respect. Truth is how a man is measured, it is all he has, it is all a man can truly take to his grave. Do not make the mistake of thinking you are worthy enough that someone has to try to impress you. You are in your very early 20's and in 30 years you should hopeful live a full and productive life. See how you like it when some young punk who so far has not done anything significant, calls you a lier on things that you have lived. See if you are as polite as me, somehow I doubt it. Sorry I have lead such a full and productive life, see if you can retire for life on your 50th birthday. You have less than 30 years better get started.