Evolution is now A FACT OF LIFE

[kebotDiNaMute]

---

what?

the guy used a figure of speech kebz. haha..you mean that the stars and the sands are equal in numbers? if you say yes, then can you give me the exact figure?

last na ni time to rest.

you still havent figure that out? there is no exact number... thats why its figure of speech.. comparison kung baga...

[chad_tukes]

I'm not really sure as well if there is any.........



However, there are limitations, genealogy DNA can only tell you about only a few of your ancestors. Exactly two of them per generation to be precise. And because each generation doubles the number of ancestors, the fraction that genetic genealogy can tell us about gets smaller and smaller. So out of sixteen great-grandparents genealogy DNA will only tell you about two great-grandparents. Why is this? Because there are only two pieces of DNA that can be traced back, the “Y” chromosome and the mitochondrial DNA. The “Y” chromosome is passed from father to son, and the mitochondrial DNA is passed from mother to child. So if you wanted to prove that a famous woman was your mother’s father’s mother with DNA testing, you are out of luck.

taboo in incest - Hanapin sa Google

so are you saying Lucy is a hoax? see Mitochondrial Eve - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

keep in mind that our gene flow decreases significantly over a period of time, thus, despite our racial differences, we still represent a remarkably homogeneous population.

[Tirong-say]

so are you saying Lucy is a hoax? see Mitochondrial Eve - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

keep in mind that our gene flow decreases significantly over a period of time, thus, despite our racial differences, we still represent a remarkably homogeneous population.

Yup I agree, but to establish the link, we need the specific genetical make-up of Lucy, then compare it to our genes, as proof of the link.....

[countrykidanthony]

and when the atheists lost the debate, they are angry...

YouTube - Todd Friel and Brian Sapient's post-debate chat

[Malic]

"many as the grains of the sand."
--- this was written on the book of JOB. Written at least 2000years ago... maybe Job is the first to invent a telescope as what you are trying to tell me.. hmmm... we shud have checked the journals...

you're skipping kebz. at first i thought we were discussing evolution. of how a hnadful of stars now numbers to like millions as what you suggested.

that's easy kebz. you don't actually need a telescope, just lie down and look to the heavens at night, and you don't need to be a scientists to know that the stars are as "many as the grains in the sand."

You must also understand, if you live in the DESERT MALIC... how many grains of sand in the desert compared to heavens... hmmmm...

cmon give me more!

what?

the guy used a figure of speech kebz. haha..you mean that the stars and the sands are equal in numbers? if you say yes, then can you give me the exact figure?

you still havent figure that out? there is no exact number... thats why its figure of speech.. comparison kung baga...

tsk tsk...gi tuyok man nimo akong ponto kebs oi. mao bitaw na akong point , basaha og osab kaw,hahayz,creationist.

[Malic]

so are you saying Lucy is a hoax? see Mitochondrial Eve - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

keep in mind that our gene flow decreases significantly over a period of time, thus, despite our racial differences, we still represent a remarkably homogeneous population.

nice point chad.

[munzter666]

YouTube - Origin Into Schools

YouTube - Rational Response Debate with Kirk Cameron pt.7

YouTube - thewayofthemaster's Channel

and here's some funny ignorant evolutionists trying to make fun of Kirk Cameron. I mean i always wonder why they always answer behind other people's camera yet when called for a debate, they failed. It's like they can't even defend evolution when on debate with educated christians.

RAY COMFORT challenged an atheist professor. (Ray Comfort is the author of the book You Can Lead an Atheist To Evidence But You Can't Make Him Think)

(and they are also ignorant when they called the crusade a christian events or the burning of witches etc... they really don't know the history after all. Real Christianity is way different than Roman Christianity which is more of "politics in the name of Christ". and when i say "real christianity" i mean the christianity that's based on the bible and not on something else)

YouTube - Kirk Cameron's Dumbass Creationist Plot Against "Origin of Species"

Most of these guys will go debating average christians who has no knowledge whatsoever about evolution and stuff...

errrrrr, huwaat!? ray comfort!? the banana guy. sheeesh. pretty please know why they call him the "banana" guy for his folly.

IDers in their not so intelligent moments.

[jamesmusslewhite]

being a Texan that you are... read this article from University of Texas at Austin:

Famous fossil Lucy scanned at the University of Texas at Austin

comments?

Yes I read that they have created a 3 dimensional digital rendering of the bone fragments That is a good thing because there will an accurate preserved digital record of each fragment.

They did not conduct any test that could have been used for the authenticity of the bone fragments. She was looking worst for ware when I took my son to see the exhibit in March of 2008 while it was displayed at the Houston Museum of Natural Sciences. I had originally taken him there so he could see the extensive Philippine sea shell and butterfly collection. I wanted him to see the natural beauty of the Philippine species before we were to move here.

I am working on your other biblical questions, just saw them this morning. Had been busy, we run several businesses which required attending.

I am also looking for the fraud evidence on Lucy, the internet is a poor place to find anything on some subjects. especially if from over 10 years ago. I miss have large reference libraries. Surigao City does not really have a public library. I want to post only from reliable site locations.

[jamesmusslewhite]

*malic back on topic


I'm wondering, when the bible said- God created man from the dirt of the earth, could that be a hint from God, giving us the idea that we did evolved from dirt?

Not dirt, dust molded into clays is what is a more accurate interpretation.

But would explain why so many people have dirty minds...


The problem is not that man evolves, of course man evolves as a species evolves. Dogs evolved from wolves and are in 1000's of sizes, shapes, and breeds; but they are all dogs and yet their DNA is that of the wolf, and not that of a fish or bird.
Man's DNA is still in the early mapping stages, and already we have determined that or DNA shows that we came from a single parent. 1 mother and 1 father. This is verifiable fact and not Theory unless one wants to say that DNA is not science. I have never found a single article stating DNA proves we were fish. Species evolve but are of that species, members of species go extinct. I am sure 100's of species of monkeys and apes have gone extinct. You can call it man if one choses but it will stii be a dead monkey or ape. There is no missing link, because we and human not monkeys and apes, even if we do not like it.

This is what causes the most problem between the two views Creationism and Evolution:
Creationist believe the single parents were on the Ark above the sea. (DNA presently show probability)
Evolutionist believe the single parents crawled up from out of that sea.(DNA proves?)
Let forget dead monkey bones, fables, stories, Bible, Darwin.Chose a science that can prove something DNA, which can be proven in court as verifiable evidence. What does the DNA show us.

[jamesmusslewhite]

Perhaps Bro Malic, maybe GOD as an omnipotent entity, can manipulate quantum mechanics, rearranging the atom, neutrons and protons, transforming dirt into flesh. For me and element is just the number of electrons of protons in an atom..........

That is just what science is trying to be, become, and do; but since they still fall short and are angered. So denial is the tool of science. If I can not do it than it does not exist. If I do not like the findings of science then it does not exist. If people ask the wrong question or believe different than me, then they do not exist. Done all in the name of science