kamo ray ga-usik2x sa inyong time entertaining a creationist.. *tsk *tsk..
no amount of reason will get thru their skulls
ikaw na mismo ang niingon wala pamo naka produce ug life from a single protein so giunsa man ninyo pag conclude that life came from a single protein? Theory pa lagi nang inyo ayaw sa mog jump into conclusion kay wala pamo naka create ug life from molecules through experimentation...sunda intawn ninyo ang Scientific Method...![]()
pagtuon pein.. pagbasa.. limited ra kaau imong understanding how these biomolecules interact and move about.. they are living molecules..
acolyte pa ka pein.. you still have the potential to make your mind useful.. if you want to really refute evolution, become a scientist.. dili ka maka-bungkag sa evolution from the outside.. its only from the inside.. solid kaayo na ug structure ang scientific community..
you're actually wasting your time trying to refute evolution from a creationist point of view.. mao to katong author sa imong source sa evolution hoax.. and kana si hovind.. deep sh*t na nuon sila tuga2x ug refute unsay labas nila ron.. really sad..
i hope dili ka mapadung dha bro..
Ease up reading the bible pein... may mahimo ka ug joke of all clowns.
If you like wikipedia: Mammoth - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Sakto si tripwire pein... basa ug science books pre!
pag produce sa lagi mo ug life from proteins and ammino acids. kung dili pa gani mo maka produce ana, then magpabiling THEORY nang inyong evolution...
The RNA World Lie
After describing the impossibility of the molecules that give rise to life, proteins, emerging spontaneously and by chance, Scientific American then went on to depict the idea of the RNA world as an alternative that might overcome all these difficulties. The fact is, however, that the RNA World thesis is a claim that even the majority of evolutionists regard as illogical and impossible, and that just a few of their colleagues shelter behind from a feeling of despair. (For the invalidity of the “RNA World” claim see, http://www.harunyahya.com/evolutiondeceit10.php)
http://www.darwinism-watch.com/index...makale_id=1859
unsay masulti nimo ani bluedes?
Last edited by Pein; 09-26-2009 at 06:35 AM.
There is no such thing as science in creationism... so I heard.
They borrow ideas from science and then they make it their own... tsk, fakers!
I bet there is creationism in science...![]()
yes john a mirror. a mirror in which we project our unknowable selves to an ideal, but indeed because we are unknowable within, the ideal in which we project ourselves suffers a lot of unwanted blemishes.
it is not Hovind that they are staring at, it is themselves that stares at themselves.
btw, how is the it across the other side of the pacific? does the carbon atom still have four electron in its outer shell?
cheers!
pein, dili naman na covered sa darwinian evolution imong claim.. i told you sa abiogenesis naman na.. you are not refuting evolution.. you are refuting abiogenesis theory on the origin of life.. ila-ilaha sa ug tarong imong kalaban bro kay nagpataka na lang ka ug tira..
imong source is biased mismo.. unsa basis sa iyang claim na in despair and majority of evolutionists regard it as illogical and impossible? nag-survey imong source? gi-interview niya tanan evolutionists? statistical data unya bro, ipakita palihug..
Similar Threads |
|