Da Vinci Code | Decoded

[The_Child]

---

just interested, do you guys in TS take Brown's book seriously? just a question.

[Hellblazer 2.1]

just interested, do you guys in TS take Brown's book seriously? just a question.

why the label "TS?" does it always follow that all of my posts must and should always represent the Theosophical Society? ever heard of the Disclaimer, professor?

personally, i don't take Dan Brown's books SERIOUSLY. but it's good entertainment.

do you take Umberto Eco's books seriously, professor? just a question.

[The_Child]

why the label TS, because i am with the assumption that your are TS. so i was asking if sa TS ba, either by study or by practice you guys take brown serioulsy. mao ra. I didnt say you represent them, i just wonder if in your studies you do. ( i wouldnt know i am an outsider, i was just curious) which disclaimer?

yes, i take most of Eco's book seriously.

[Hellblazer 2.1]

why the label TS, because i am with the assumption that your are TS. so i was asking if sa TS ba, either by study or by practice you guys take brown serioulsy. mao ra. I didnt say you represent them, i just wonder if in your studies you do. ( i wouldnt know i am an outsider, i was just curious) which disclaimer?

yes, i take most of Eco's book seriously.

then might as well leave out the Theosophical Society. because not all of them are into Dan Brown. my dear professor, the disclaimer is this: my posts do not necessarily represent the whole Theosophical Society. so please stop generalizing things you are only assuming. i read Dan Brown because i find it entertaining. i do not take seriously because it's still fiction. although, there may be facts in what he wrote, well, that's for us to separate fact from fiction.

in the Theosophical Society, we do not study Dan Brown either as a course or by practice, hence, we do not take Dan Brown seriously. like i said, it's a good fiction book. okay, professor?

Foucault's Pendulum seriously? wow, prof.

[The_Child]

am just clarifying about TS, no need to burst an artery particularly the way you keep on referring to me as 'professor' in which i clearly am not. Either that or your just keen into labeling me as one, out of sarcasm perhaps.

anyways, yes. i was just clarifying.

cheers!

[Hellblazer 2.1]

whatever you say, professor of philosophy at usc. whatever you say.

cheers too.

[The_Child]

whatever you say, professor of philosophy at usc. whatever you say.

cheers too.

it just fascinates me why you keep on bringing that up. hmmm.... why o why even though its so far far far away from the topic.

then again, one could never understand fanaticism in logical terms. I'm not God, I'm not Truth, I'm not religion. No need to attempt to bridge things which are not there.

cheers!

[Lovely Charm]

@Hellblazer, i think sr child is just clarifying po, my history po kayo ng sabonotan,he,he parang mainit ang dugo mo kay the child..

Di ba fiction yung book?
What makes it interesting lang kasi it drags the catholic church as the culprit na naman,,
You cant blame dan brown for capitalizing the reputation of the catholic church, kumbaga Max alvarado na ang personality....a good source for a villain or tyrant in any fictional books.

@Tokidok, your right seeing the fanatics faith trembling is entertaining.

[josephdc]

I've seen the movie but my faith wasn't shaken at all, because I went there to be entertained and not really informed about Church history or anything.

[Lovely Charm]

I've seen the movie but my faith wasn't shaken at all, because I went there to be entertained and not really informed about Church history or anything.

then you dont belong to the fanatics