Science and Bible Accuracies, A Magnificent God!

[cromagnon]

---

The origin and the people who spread christianity around the world are European's .

now Europe has a statistic's of 85% unbeliever .

it just shows how dilluded humans are.

[kebotDiNaMute]

The origin and the people who spread christianity around the world are European's .

now Europe has a statistic's of 85% unbeliever .

it just shows how dilluded humans are.

proof be! diin ka statistics ani brad?

[tarpolano]

hagoy! patay! science never stops brad.... The argument stated there are two claims brad, He exist the others don't. So for sure one of us is WRONG. Kay para ta magka sinabot what to achieve gaan tika analogy ha.

argument is IS THERE A GOD?
claim 1: YES
claim 2: NO

Analogy:
Naay YUTA ingon ato LOLO.
Kinsay tagiya sa yuta? <---- argument
Ingon ko AKO <---- Claim 1
Ingon ka IMO <---- Claim 2

Question Ako ba ang yuta? Answer Dili.
Question Imo ba ang yuta? Answer Dili.

nano wala may tag iya sa YUTA(claim) because both dont have evidence. GETS?

Back to the TOPIC.

If BIG BANG will indeed be proven RIGHT then it will wipe out the very existence of the Christian God.

IS THERE A GOD? you said NO
IS BIGBANG TRUE? I said NO

So question How can you prove to something that never existed? Answer, you can if you can prove the very opposite of its NATURE. I hope brad you will understand how evidence work... it works both ways, for now brad, wala pay tag iya ang yuta kay pareho ta walay sak2 na ebidensya.

Another Thing, You can prove your innosence to a crime you never committed. If you can't then you must be the SUSPECT. HAHAHAHA!

May pa imo lolo naay yuta. Pero sayop man imo analogy kay makakita man ta sa yuta, mahikap man nato. Unya pwede man ta manguta sa atong lolo kung kinsa makatagiya. Pero kung mosulti ka kung naay gino-o mohatag jud ka og ebidensya kung naa.. ikaw may nisutli nga naa. Pero ako nga nisulti nga walay gino-o unsao nako og hatag ana og ebidensya?

[cromagnon]

YouTube - Bill O'Reilly SCARED by Richard Dawkins annouced by a believer

leme provide another anology

An apple fell of an apple tree. 2 ants are debating how the apple got there on the groun.

ant 1 : a magic fairy creator using a magic wand created the apple there.
ant 2: I suppose it came from the tree that is my theory even tho i dint see it happen.

[kebotDiNaMute]

May pa imo lolo naay yuta. Pero sayop man imo analogy kay makakita man ta sa yuta, mahikap man nato. Unya pwede man ta manguta sa atong lolo kung kinsa makatagiya. Pero kung mosulti ka kung naay gino-o mohatag jud ka og ebidensya kung naa.. ikaw may nisutli nga naa. Pero ako nga nisulti nga walay gino-o unsao nako og hatag ana og ebidensya?

Sa ato pa kung pasanginlan ka og krimen... d diay ka mangita ebidensya? hagoy! wa bya kay gi buhat... hmmm if you ask me brad how to find the evidence, its your responsibility or you can sit back and wait for us to produce... gets? evidences work both ways. you cannot claim to something you don't have evidence.

[tarpolano]

Sa ato pa kung pasanginlan ka og krimen... d diay ka mangita ebidensya? hagoy! wa bya kay gi buhat... hmmm if you ask me brad how to find the evidence, its your responsibility or you can sit back and wait for us to produce... gets? evidences work both ways. you cannot claim to something you don't have evidence.

di man krimen ato gi-istoryahan, gino-o man. Di naman tingali nato kinahanglan lisod-lisoron... kay kung naay gino-o naa jud kay ipakita nga ebidensya. Unya dili man ako ang angay nga pangayoan og ebidensya kay dili man ako ang nagsulti nga naay gino-o kaw man. Total unsaon man nimo og hatag ug ebenisya sa usa ka butang nga wala?

[kebotDiNaMute]

di man krimen ato gi-istoryahan, gino-o man. Di naman tingali nato kinahanglan lisod-lisoron... kay kung naay gino-o naa jud kay ipakita nga ebidensya. Unya dili man ako ang angay nga pangayoan og ebidensya kay dili man ako ang nagsulti nga naay gino-o kaw man. Total unsaon man nimo og hatag ug ebenisya sa usa ka butang nga wala?

hagoy kalisud jud... ambot lang brad... lisud man ka istoryahon bahin ebedensya... cge gud luck brad... you are asking how to prove man kaha... so i give u an analogy how.. but if that does not fit then lets just say we could not come to a good argument...

"Total unsaon man nimo og hatag ug ebenisya sa usa ka butang nga wala?"
--- sample proof, if Big bang is proven right then its a very good EVIDENCE. if d japon ka maka gets brad, well gud luck nalang...

[cromagnon]

sakto btaw tarpolano , kung mo sibya ka nga naa ginuo naa jud ibedensya

[tripwire]

Let's see, how many times that people are trying to predict that Christ will come on those predicted years?"
--- who predicted the Bible or a people like you?

HUH?

"Yes nostradamus is predicting and manytimes he is wrong".
--- its a science called the SCIENCE OF PREDICTION

Yeah, there is science in every prediction but based on statistical data not some magical data or some futuristic data that it will happen.

What I have posted is a affirmation of Science
--- Is there anything wrong with science affirms to what has predicted a thousands of years earlier. Tell me if there is anything wrong with it. If non then quit your so called SANITY. AGAIN whats wrong with the POSTS? hmmm. I was wondering why you fight so hard and you call me ... hmmmm. My logic tells me there is something you are reacting but you never told me... just say it whats wrong with the posts? hmmm

Kebz, let's put it this way... when THEY predicted it that it will happen in the future it was a straight true/false probability - fast forward to our present time and "some" people thought that it was true then the chances of that prediction is greater but there is no 100% sure predictions because there is still a true/false probabilty. Science may have seen it but it will take time to confirm that it is 100% true. Like what happened to the great flood and only 8 people were alive - God predicted that from 8 people He saved all humanity will be like Noah and the rest. But what are we now? Did it gave true predictions? uh uh... NOPE! I'm not fighting anything kebz, all I am showing you is to read books you will never go further with these things... you get stuck in the same mud. If you want to get stuck... try another mud. But you don't see the logic there because you want everyone here in this forum to confirm your self discovery findings... the problem is that those aren't confirmed.

What's wrong with your post? READ MY VERY FIRST REPLY in this topic.

[chad_tukes]

i'd have to agree w/ trip. probability and/or coincidence is what makes a good prediction. too bad people tend to fall into its trap. just because a prediction happened in our current time doesn't make the prediction valid.