Who made the BIG BANG - a creator or physics??

[bluedes]

---

hahaha, don't give that obligation trip... its your obligation to prove it... because you buy the idea... if you want my answer.. "WELL NOBODY FROM THE DEAD CONFIRM IT ANYWAY?" my God came back and said, he conquer death proving he is GOD. OK.. EVOLUTION huh? I don't know trip what you are trying to achieve but its not my obligation to find proof your belief... JUST FIND IT YOURSELF... sorry...

BETTER YOU GUYS WATCH THIS DEBATE... NOT THIS KIND OF LOW BALLER DEBATE...
YouTube - hovind rainbow debate

if you want a high caliber debate check it out...

brad, you are asking for evidence of evolution?

it is already presented everywhere by scientific communities in journals and publications.
now the question is: where is your evidence against it?

nindot ni i-repeat ang question ni trip:

Let's say Jesus came back from the dead, who else in this world came back and said that evolution is false? Can you name that person? kana lang for now.

[kebot]

brad, you are asking for evidence of evolution?

it is already presented everywhere by scientific communities in journals and publications.
now the question is: where is your evidence against it?

nindot ni i-repeat ang question ni trip:

Brad analyze sa situation ha:

You want me to believe in evolution. I said give me your proof... OK

why you ask me now for my proof that i dont believe... wahahaha! Brad its your obligation to provide... if wala aw wala.. d mo maka pugos nako.. hahaha! common sense gain brad...

If mamogos ko ninyo sa akoa brad, aw kana pede naka mo demand og proof... gets... ayaw ko hasula sa imo logic... if you really want.. watch this bigtime debate...

YouTube - hovind rainbow debate

I can copy the proof dd2 brad pero tapol man mo hatagan... so d lang ko wala btaw ko mamugos... GETS?

[bluedes]

Brad analyze sa situation ha:

You want me to believe in evolution. I said give me your proof... OK

why you ask me now for my proof that i dont believe... wahahaha! Brad its your obligation to provide... if wala aw wala.. d mo maka pugos nako.. hahaha! common sense gain brad...

If mamogos ko ninyo sa akoa brad, aw kana pede naka mo demand og proof... gets... ayaw ko hasula sa imo logic... if you really want.. watch this bigtime debate...

YouTube - hovind rainbow debate

I can copy the proof dd2 brad pero tapol man mo hatagan... so d lang ko wala btaw ko mamugos... GETS?

brad, your logic is inverted..

you are not asked to believe in evolution..

scientists formulate in evolution, and they give lots of evidence and study supporting it. you say it's not true? so give your evidence and studies to counter that its not true.. so where is it now?

kasimple ra ana oi..

you are the one saying its not true.. when in the first place you're not even asked to believe in it.. pastilan na lng nimo kebz.. asa man ka gikan sa imong logic oy?

[kebot]

brad, your logic is inverted..

you are not asked to believe in evolution..

scientists formulate in evolution, and they give lots of evidence and study supporting it. you say it's not true? so give your evidence and studies to counter that its not true.. so where is it now?

kasimple ra ana oi..

you are the one saying its not true.. when in the first place you're not even asked to believe in it.. pastilan na lng nimo kebz.. asa man ka gikan sa imong logic oy?

hahaha, brad, ang proof lage... nano pangayoan man ko nmo proof d ko mo 2o... you presented your evolution.. then proof... brad mag pa tortillas ko sa ako itlog if naa namoy proof... because the fact is there is no such proof as of this time... nano gahi man ka kasabot ani... hahaha! tsk tsk tsk... all they have are theories... that does not imply a fact...
example...

To prove a coffe drink.. you need a coffe and water... what you have is just water... wheres the cofee? hahaha! brad tanaw nalang ani na link para ka maka Gets? actually this is a low baller debate...

YouTube - hovind rainbow debate <---- they got scientific story...
kita wala puro ra copy paste...

[butitoy]

i had also read charles darwin's book

" story of evolution , based on the animals he had observed in the galapagos island "
....selection | propagation thru adaption of species with it's natural environment "

the law of the jungle.the weakling will become food for the mighty.



>>>>but, think about this....

if homo sapiens is an evolved monkey, how come there are still monkeys left?



does it means that the darwin theory is wrong?

or the sapiens was'nt able to ate all the remaining monkeys?

[bluedes]

i had also read charles darwin's book

" story of evolution , based on the animals he had observed in the galapagos island "
....selection | propagation thru adaption of species with it's natural environment "

the law of the jungle.the weakling will become food for the mighty.



>>>>but, think about this....

if homo sapiens is an evolved monkey, how come there are still monkeys left?



does it means that the darwin theory is wrong?

or the sapiens was'nt able to ate all the remaining monkeys?

you misunderstand the evolution of species..

[bluedes]

hahaha, brad, ang proof lage... nano pangayoan man ko nmo proof d ko mo 2o... you presented your evolution.. then proof... brad mag pa tortillas ko sa ako itlog if naa namoy proof... because the fact is there is no such proof as of this time... nano gahi man ka kasabot ani... hahaha! tsk tsk tsk... all they have are theories... that does not imply a fact...
example...

To prove a coffe drink.. you need a coffe and water... what you have is just water... wheres the cofee? hahaha! brad tanaw nalang ani na link para ka maka Gets? actually this is a low baller debate...

YouTube - hovind rainbow debate <---- they got scientific story...
kita wala puro ra copy paste...

brad, there is no proof? kanus-a man ka natawo, 15th century?

do you read books on evolution? because if you do not read any books on evolution, then you do not see the evidence or proof of evolution..

kinsa man gasulti nimo na there is no proof as of this time intawn oi? asa man tawn ka kabasa ana..

mas maayo pa na mu-angkon ka na wala ka kasabot sa evolution kaysa mu-ingon ka na dili na tinuod..

[Traditz]

mura'g OT na lagi ta...

di ba nagkinahanglan man ta og large hadron collider para maka-"reproduce" sa initial conditions sa big bang on a minute scale dire sa kalibutan? og ang LHD took many, many years to prepare and create, unya nag-involve siya og great amounts of intelligence and planning to design? nag-wonder lang ko, unsa kaha ang nag-"produce" sa original big bang?

[kebot]

brad, there is no proof? kanus-a man ka natawo, 15th century?

do you read books on evolution? because if you do not read any books on evolution, then you do not see the evidence or proof of evolution..

kinsa man gasulti nimo na there is no proof as of this time intawn oi? asa man tawn ka kabasa ana..

mas maayo pa na mu-angkon ka na wala ka kasabot sa evolution kaysa mu-ingon ka na dili na tinuod..

simple ra ako tubag nmo brad ASA? if proven nani brad.. this is no theory anymore... hahay. again ASA MAN? don't give me crap kay daghan nako debate gi watch brad... and it seems nobody could disprove creationism...

[bluedes]

mura'g OT na lagi ta...

di ba nagkinahanglan man ta og large hadron collider para maka-"reproduce" sa initial conditions sa big bang on a minute scale dire sa kalibutan? og ang LHD took many, many years to prepare and create, unya nag-involve siya og great amounts of intelligence and planning to design? nag-wonder lang ko, unsa kaha ang nag-"produce" sa original big bang?

brad, did it ever occur also that the constituents of very small particles are actually very simple.. but we are huge in size but slow.. and it takes very large speeds to recreate this collision. the concept of LHD is very simple. it does not take much IQ to understand it.