Who made the BIG BANG - a creator or physics??

[tripwire]

---

Here are some good reading:

Big Bang Cosmology Primer

WMAP Big Bang Cosmology

Bear in mind that the above explanations are not to overthrow your personal beliefs but an understanding to which science observed.

[rapperyz]

I made BigBang...then I made Cloud9 ... so u still want God? or me?

[Kenshiro]

who made the tunnel? who made the world, who made the universe, who made my toilet?
exactly, why both the camps in this thread are boring.

Yeah because it doesn't make any sense.

One question for the one you quoted not your statement though to save some space. Does this theory involves chance. Has there been any experiments being done with this.

Well in in that theory its talking nothing about evidences put its pure &^*%^&%&&%& kinda stuff.
Its like one strategy of a sales man who bombards its customer with information whether they are full of truths half truths, theories, hypothesis, assumptions, unfounded evidences, and of course hersay (Bull****).
In the end the dumb customer will just purchase not because it is factual but by how it is explained.

Please talk in laymans terms because we are not with the same camp. An explanations that can be understood both camps and can potentially make a religious man an athiestic. As we are doing with an Athiestic to be converted to follow the Truth.

[kebot]

"The big bang theory states that at some time in the distant past there was nothing. A process known as vacuum fluctuation created what astrophysicists call a singularity. From that singularity, which was about the size of a dime, our Universe was born."
Big Bang Cosmology Primer

Well if you ask me, this is still magic. Only possible by CREATOR.

[butitoy]

The question WHO made this and that is even a wrong question. Do you think GOD is a man who possess a PERSONALITY? THINK AGAIN!

is that means to say u belive in GOD? THINK AGAIN!

[butitoy]

who made the tunnel? who made the world, who made the universe, who made my toilet?
exactly, why both the camps in this thread are boring.

its boring cuz they present unproofed theories of from nothingness into universe

its boring cuz they wont answer the simple question..

cgurado alegre gyud if mutubag cla.

[bungot25]

its boring cuz they present unproofed theories of from nothingness into universe

its boring cuz they wont answer the simple question..

cgurado alegre gyud if mutubag cla.

tinoud gyud ka sir...............

[vanschen]

kng nag lalis na mga tao ug time zero or "big bang." mas mag lalis pa gyud what came before that. a universe before a universe.

..What is it that breathes fire into the equations and makes a universe for them to describe? The usual approach of science of constructing a mathematical model cannot answer the question of why there should be a universe for the model to describe. Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?..Or does it need a creator, and, if so, does He have any effect on the universe other than being responsible for its existence?
And who created Him?.. page 135. -Theory of Everything [Stephen Hawking]

chicken or egg? [this analogy has broken down since we already know which came first. (the universe came first then galaxies then planets then biology). but a philosophical-personal one.

[tripwire]

^^ ang manok ang una! Kinsa may maglumlum sa itlog. Asa gikan ang manok? of course sa itlog but the analogy here is that life started an organism. In my zoology class [if I can remember...], there is one-singled cell called protozoa which they breathe, move, and reproduce like multicelled animals in water.

Really, we all have opinions about life and within the confines of time and space so accepting that everything has a beginning and an end is easy. Creationism begins with the finished product, complete with reproductive system and separate genders. But that aspect only arises when one searches for more answers about the Creator instead of the creation. Evolution begins with a one-celled life existing in water that somehow makes its way to land, grows legs, develops a reproductive system so that it can procreate, and then the most progressive from each species evolves to something else, creating a new reproductive system that matches another. Now both of these theories require some faith since none of us were present at any inception.

If one is pondering the question, “which came first, the chicken or the egg,” the answer will depend on which theory you are leaning toward.

As for me, I chose to believe evolution. Why? Human dna proves that each and everyone of us is unique. And there is no single person that are alike. Just my opinion actually.

[tripwire]

Now, where is my opinion going to? Let's evaluate the process. We all know that there is no such thing as "finished product" - would you agree? Evrything starts a process of layout, drawings, what fits and what not. There comes a solution and putting them altogether in one system of assembly. In this case the theory of BB. Science did a process of assembly and constant observation according to current scientific instruments. It may be a theory to some but their theories have a general impact in our lives, which we are now enjoying.

Note: If some of you refutes my opinion, kindly give me your opinion also but be aware, we are here to discuss the possiblities of existence not to quarrel who is correct and who isn't.