bottomline of man's origin

[therealmacoy]

---

Let me answer your questions and not deviate from the issue of origin:

"There are only two fundamentally different explanations for the origin of any complex structure (man). Either it owes its ultimate origin to chance and the intrinsic properties of nature, or to intelligent design imposed on nature. Thus the print (and message) you see on this page must ultimately be the result of either the intrinsic properties of ink and paper, or the extrinsic design of an author and publisher imposed on ink and paper. The essential difference between chance and design is that only the latter involves purposeful intent." - David N. Menton (Should Christians make peace with Darwin?)

To summarize the statement above: either we owe our existence to chance and the intrinsic properties of nature or there is an intelligent (Divine) hand that imposed it's design on nature.

You want proof about the Genesis theory, read the bible and the Human Genome Project.

You want proof that the Evolution theory is flawed? Read on:

Theory of evolution supporters claim that the universe started 14-17 Billion years ago. This length of time will be sufficient enough to allow evolution to take place. However, technical data currently acquired by the Hubble Space Telescope indicates that the universe is only 8-10 billion years old. By this alone the evolution from a single celled organisim to the common man (60,000yrs ago) will not be sufficient. We would still be chimpanzee's if we are to follow this argument. Although i must agree that some men i know here still think they are chimpanzee's. How then could evolution take place with that time frame alone? Please answer that...

Now can you please provide PROOF here the missing link (the ape that will link to the homo sapien or modern man) is so that we can finally say that we came from the apes?

If you could show that now, then I will take your side already and take back everything i wrote here and say that i'm a monkey... till then you are the only descendant of the monkeys.

Science has proven religion time and again. I have no bad apple agains the theory of evolution, in fact, many of the biblical miracles have been corroborated by science. They go hand in hand.

[therealmacoy]

Moderators, please don't close yet... we need to wait for the PROOF on the MISSING LINK by cromagnon.

[romano2717]

wala mn cguro nag ingon si Charles Darwin na ang taw gikan sa apes/monkeys. please read again and this time, understand what you read.

[Tirong-say]

I think, stop nata ug kombati about origin sa taw...

Monkey man siguro ta nga top sa tanan monkey sa Earth.

God made lots of species of monkey..and we are one of them..

Denial lng cguro ang taw..di mo admit monkey siya...hangtod karun...we r still lying to ourselves

di jud mahuman ang debati...

heheheh

I agree,problema lang tingale masuko si Bay Charles nato he-he,but yes it makes sense after all ngano naa pa man unggoy karon ngano wala man na sila nanga-convert ug tawo kung tinuod pa nang theory of evolution.Kung environmental adoptation pud mao kuno upright na ta mo-lakaw kay mi-adopt ang mga unggoy ug lakaw sa yuta instead mag-kapyot2 sa kahoy tungod kuno kay naa puy makita pagkaon sa yuta,unya ang tawo nga hilig kaayo kat2(mountain climbing) o dili ba iya work kanunay pud mo-kat2(lineman,tubaman) mahimo pud diay na silang unggoy madugay.imposible pud no,mao na ilaha giingon ang unggoy nahimong tawo unya ang tawo nahimong unggoy he-he.

[rbrallos]

ang tao kumbinasyon sa unggoy ug alien

[therealmacoy]

ang tao, gkan sa cookies. ang uban rare, medium rare, nya naay well done... hehehe

[cromagnon]

even if what missing link youre looking for its a 99% posible - compared to ur genesis - which i think 2% ra ang probability in the world with body of knowledge. which i would like to prefer to believe.

other than you're genesis , which you think is true - on ur wolrd = the unlogical unresonable 2,000 year old ideology ( )

but if you choose to believe that we are not from monkey then its ur's.

but i strongly believe, it totaly posible.

[romano2717]

even if what missing link youre looking for its a 99% posible - compared to ur genesis - which i think 2% ra ang probability in the world with body of knowledge. which i would like to prefer to believe.

other than you're genesis , which you think is true - on ur wolrd = the unlogical unresonable 2,000 year old ideology ( )

but if you choose to believe that we are not from monkey then its ur's.

but i strongly believe, it totaly posible.

brad according to the Theory of Human Evolution presented by Charles Darwin, we are an in-direct descendant of apes. Apes and humans have a common ancestor. pro di ta prehas og linya nga gi agi-an sa unggoy. lahe ra pag sabot nmo brad. mao nay kasagaran mis-conception sa mga taw when it comes to Human Evolution.
Anyway, theory rmn sd na, we can believe whatever we want as long as we keep our minds open and respect each others ideas.

[bolivar1985]

where scientific ends bible begins.

[kcgal90]

There are two schools of thought when we talk of the origin of man. The evolution theory of Charles Darwin and the GENESIS theory of the Bible. Both have their points and both have their cons. Either way they are both unproven... why? read on...

The bible purely relies on faith and belief to convince us that we came from a superior being that by genetic selection separated us from the fauna of the earth. There is no hard proof that it is true... that I must agree. But fact that nations have been built and organized under the precept and concept of the bible's simple truths and laws leaves me wondering... is this POCKETBOOK (as CROMAGNON loves to call it) really just a pigment of somebody's imagination? Surely a simple pocketbook could not be that true for a whole civilization to use it as a referrence and guide and yet not hold it to be true? Show me a pocketbook that can do this... Genesis merely stated that GOD created us in his own image and likeness. Whether HE molded us from the single celled organism until we were formed into a superior man (like HIM) or with the snap of a finger created Adam and Eve, is not evolution by any definition!!!

If i were to take the case of the evolution theory, i still have questions. ... where is the missing link? The apeman that linked the future man with the homo-erectus? Nada!!!

The theory of evolution by Darwin if theoretically linked to Hawking's BIG BANG THEORY (as opposed to the BIBLE's theory of creation). From the Big Bang theory (exploding star), single-celled organisms have evolved to that diversity of life we have here on earth. The birds, the trees, the water, the animals, and yes... even cromagnon man. Billions and trillions of years ago, we all started out as MINDLESS cells with no sexual definition. From there, life evolved.

I have no question with that, but even that is still a theory begging to be proven by hard facts... which sadly is still in its infancy...

In the end, it's all a question of faith. While i am a scientific man that doesn't discount the fact that the theory of evolution might be correct i am currently putting my chips on that proven theory that a SUPREME BEING (maybe a superior ALIEN or the ALMIGHTY GOD) created me and you... that's what i want my son to believe... maybe later on, if they have already convincing proof that the missing link realy is true and that genetic mapping links us to the monkeys... I might change side.

But as for now... I came from ADAM (handsome and superior) while cromagnon man and the others belong to the monkeys.

How about you? Which side are you on?

There are more than two schools of thought. We all have to remember that there is more than one religion in this world- it's not only Christianity.