Yes
No
as far as i heard ipa legal daw ni hasta gani ng divorce ipa legalize pod di na maayo oi mypa dili og wala para walay daghang questions og gubot ky di man pod na maayo
Actually, increased contraceptive usage in a country leads to more abortions.
The Role of Contraception in Increasing Abortion
By Ruben Obregon
http://www.noroomforcontraception.co...d-Abortion.htm
During the course of these legal developments, the percentage of women aged 15-19 who ever engaged in premarital *** continued to rise. The figures rose from 30.4% in 1971 to 43.4% in 1976, and rose again to 49.8 % in 1979.
. . .
As the number of younger and younger teens became sexually active, and as both married and unmarried women had increasing access to contraception, the abortion rates rose.
. . .
Abortion rates did not decrease with increased access to contraception -- they increased instead. So did the pregnancy rates -- the only thing that decreased was the birth rate (due to increased abortion).
. . .
In addition, studies conducted in California, Washington state, Scotland, England, Sweden and China “show no reduction in pregnancy or abortion rates despite increased availability of contraception or emergency contraception,” Wills concludes (Wills, Washington Post, 10/21).
Increased access to contraception not linked to decrease in numbers of unplanned pregnancies, abortions
http://www.news-medical.net/?id=20761
The belief that increased access to contraception will “reduce rates of unintended pregnancy and abortion” has “intuitive appeal, but the data prove otherwise,” Susan Wills, associate director for education for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Secretariat for Pro-Life Activities, writes in a Washington Post letter to the editor in response to a Post opinion piece by William Saletan, science and technology reporter for Slate magazine.
Contraception – It’s time to stop ducking the issue
http://www.noroomforcontraception.co...t/view/106/57/
According to the study Trends in Premarital *** in the United States, 1954-2003, the increase in premarital *** amongst a group of teens turning 15 during the years 1964-1973 “may be partly due to increased availability of effective contraception (in particular, the pill), which made it less likely that *** would lead to pregnancy.” (Finer, 2007)
Habit Persistence and Teen ***: Could Increased Access to Contraception have Unintended Consequences for Teen Pregnancies?
http://www.econ.duke.edu/~psarcidi/teensex.pdf
The persistence in sexual activity is such that policies that affect access to contraception will have very different effects in the short run than the long run. Our results suggest that increasing access to contraception may actually increase long run pregnancy rates even though short run pregnancy rates fall. On the other and, policies that decrease access to contraception, and hence sexual activity, are likely to lower pregnancy rates in the long run.
--
http://www.petitiononline.com/xxhb5043/
Last edited by mannyamador; 05-16-2009 at 01:59 AM.
im totally against it....
lets pray and pray that this will not happen in our country....
i think this was also related sa issue before about House Bill 4110...i think mao na...hmmm,abortion is usually the cause of PMS (pre marital ***)..we alwys tackle this up since college til now...dili man lang ni ma resolve sa family planning lang cause kasagaran mangapil ani kay kato man mga married na..how about those teens or young adults na nag engaged ug ingon ani?sila ang usually mka buhat anang abortion kay they are not yet responsible enough with their actions...
Similar Threads |
|