Game that has the heaviest requirement

[omniknight]

---

bug-at man diod dx 10 3d games..

[Conrad]

Me i have a 9800GX2, 3Ghz E8400 and 2Gb ram, so far wala ko ni kamang sa fear2, assasin creed, ug colin mc rae all max. If that Flight simulator is true, Cgurado kamang jud ako pc ana.

[Merman]

well gta iv is proc hungry game, recomended yud multicore proc ani, but grapiks dli kaau bug at, u can observe thru iya ingane benchmark niya, mas dako percentage ang kaon sa cpu kaisa uban, well the heaviest wud be crysiswarhead,crysis na game. la pay gpu mka run ani max out, with >60 fps, tingale.

[rodsky]

Just got this from Datablitz...



It's not that demanding but...

...it comes in 6 DVDs...

...and requires about 60gig of HD space...so I think in terms of Hard Disk space consumption, this game/sim is tops.

Hmmm, I think it's time to erase part of my porn collection.

-RODION

[lokster]

@ rodsky, is it worth it? lol looks like another flight sim

[rodsky]

@ rodsky, is it worth it?

I'm a die-hard. I've been flightsimming since 1986...

1986: Flight Simulator v2.0

1987: Falcon by Spectrum Holobyte, Chuck Yeager's Air Combat

1989: Battle of Britain, Secret Weapons of the Luftwaffe

1990: Flight Simulator 3.0 Falcon AT

1992: Falcon 3.0, Aces of the Pacific

1995: Flight Simulator 4.0, Aces over Europe

1997: Falcon 4.0, Flight Simulator 6.0

2001: Flight Simulator 2002

2003: Flight Simulator 2004, X-Plane 6.0, IL-2 Sturmovik

2005: Falcon 4.0: Allied Force, Pacific Fighters

2008: IL-2: 1946

I've broken, mended and modded over 13 joysticks since 1986.

...so, from my perspective, of course it's worth it!

-RODION

[lokster]

wow! lol im into flight sims too but im more of arcade than the super detail real thing,

dont see Flight Simulator X or acceleration on there ^^

[rodsky]

wow! lol im into flight sims too but im more of arcade than the super detail real thing,

dont see Flight Simulator X or acceleration on there ^^

Because I don't like it--too much system requirements merely for "eye-candy" (you have to upgrade to Vista just for THAT) . I still prefer FS2004 over FSX.

For me, eye-candy doesn't equal realism. An accurate physics simulation is better.

And if I wanted an arcade game, give me Super Mario anytime.

Simulations are food for the mind, not food for laughs/fun.

-RODION

[Merman]

Because I don't like it--too much system requirements merely for "eye-candy" (you have to upgrade to Vista just for THAT) . I still prefer FS2004 over FSX.

For me, eye-candy doesn't equal realism. An accurate physics simulation is better.

And if I wanted an arcade game, give me Super Mario anytime.

Simulations are food for the mind, not food for laughs/fun.

-RODION

have u tried EVASIVE ACTION, old dos flight sim. many military flight sims that time was made my Microprose.

[rodsky]

have u tried EVASIVE ACTION, old dos flight sim. many military flight sims that time was made my Microprose.

I don't think I have, sorry. The Microprose flight sims I've tried (but not on my list above because I spent little time with them) are:

1988: F-15 Strike Eagle, F-19 Stealth Fighter

1990: F-117 Stealth Fighter

1991: F-15 Strike Eagle II

1993: Gunship 2000 (heli)

1997: F-15 Strike Eagle III

But we're straying from the topic, so let me get it back on track...

Another game coming up which could need pretty demanding PC specs...

Operation Flashpoint 2








Malapit na!!!

OPERATION FLASHPOINT : DRAGON RISING ™| CODEMASTERS

-RODION