Did you know that...?

[rcruman]

---

walay contradiction? weren't you following regnauld's thread na "bible contradictions"? rcruman, you are in a state of denial if you say walay contradictions ang gospels.

so what's your next answer? that God put those contradictions there to test our faith? is that it, rcruman? how convenient!

its only the readers who interpret personally has contradictions , let the bible explain then it will be cleared.

Peace!

[rcruman]

if God so Powerful, All-Mighty, why would He use anybody? isn't He big enough to do it Himself?

are you okay? bro GOD do in any ways, HE can use anybody.
its hard for you to grasp it because in the first place you don't believed on the GOD of the BIBLE and even doubted HIM because of His commandments that you can't bear.

Peace!

[rcruman]

yes, translation ra gihapon.

you mean, the truth according to you.

i think youre just making fun and doesn't make sense anymore.

read the bible if you can, for you to understand about the truth of the bible without any doubts.

Peace!

[rcruman]

before they were compiled, the books (more than 66, actually) already existed. the timetables they were written are different. they are NOT eyewitness accounts of the time Jesus the Christ had lived because those gospels were written many years after his death (he didn't ascend, sorry catholics). and those gospels were not written by the supposed disciples, but were only attributed to them.

gets na nimo?

then let me say this to you for your satisfaction.

FYI lang bro (kung imo dawaton, if not then just ignore this).

THE accounts or information in the bible doesn't rely only on ink and paper (other media).
even the apostles are one type of media that the bible existed.

even our history books were not written directly as if happens just a while ago.

read 1 corinthians 4:6, 1 John 1:1-5 and 2 John 1:12.

Peace!

[rcruman]

yep it will. most of the crap we have to argue about is because people like to make their own interpretations about what was already lost in translation.

then show me proof bro that the verse I've given in english is wrong or lost translation compared to arabic.
its not my own interpretations but rather i give the verse as what is written in Majority of the bible translation.

PEace!

[Malic]

its the will of GOD.
Peace!

hahaha! how convenient!

is that the best you can come up with, rcruman? i don't buy it.

Acutally sir he doesnt know. hehe.


The letters and books inlcuded in the compiled bible were done by bishops who were greatly influenced by a church father.

Daghan pa man unta to puede isulod nga mas reliable pero because of theological bias they rejected it.

Spoiler! 

rcruman kabalo ka o wala about sa history sa pag compile sa bible?

[amingb]

Para sa akoa bahala kinsay nag compile anang Bible basta what was written must be follow.

[Sovabon]

Bible for me is the sole source of truth.

[Red.Emano]

sole? then stop going to school for everything else you learnt outside the bible is false!

[NASYO]

Bible for me is the sole source of truth.

with respect to your own belief sir. but not in general.