because there is no one true cup, or should i say the holy grail?
in the documentary The Da Vinci Project, that extra hand there is said to belong to Judas Iscariot.
As far as art historians are concerned, nothing. Their opinions are the only thing I'm concerned with, bah.
What did Leonardo da Vinci really want to portray about Jesus in his painting?
for me there is nothing wrong whatsoever with that painting because everybody should have known that da vinci was not yet born or had never met the subjects in person and that everything in that portrait is out of his imagination the way he sees it fit.
therefore, he can do what he want, pwede niya apilan ug iring sa lamesa, nobody cares. pwede niya butangan ug gisi ang hapin sa lamesa it's up to him.
bottomline is, there should have been no debate of any sort regarding any controversy or mystery unless naay ghostly image nga nitunga way labot sa painting.
Da Vinci was a fake.
Dan Brown is the original painter.
Similar Threads |
|