The Rise of Adolf Hitler - from unknown to dictator of germany

[pnoize]

---

ignorance?..i am not ignorant of what the nazi swastika mean..i know the holocaust is a bad chapter in human history..sure a lot of jews died during those times..if you look at the negative aspect sa swastika then i will agree that it is an ignorant and insensitive gesture..but when will people stop giving the nazi swastika the dirty look?..sure they're one of the most inhuman bastards that ever lived pero kbaw nman ta ana why don't you look more than...i bet you don't even know the real deal why the jews where killed and persecuted..mabaw ra cguro..people are still stuck up with the anger over what the nazis have done..well i was one of them before but i just realized that if we still continue with these kinds of feelings cge tag hate and never learn from what happened then i guess we are nazis in the making cguro dli napd jews ang atong tirada..grow up oi!..cgeg hate! sure the nazis are to be hated for what they have done pero it's about time to put away the hating face and start learning out of the situation..try looking at the nazi swastika in a different light pd oi! i don't mean to say that we should forgive and forget..learn from the experience para dli na mausab kaysa mag cge kag hate dha..i find it so childish if people start cringing or unsa dinha when they see the nazi swastika..be mature..your grimacing doesn't change anything!..it goes to show nga the nazis has indeed suceeded in sowing racism in the world..

the swastika as a symbol for hatred will change when it's use by racist organizations has stopped. even today, neo-nazis and skin heads use the swastika as a symbol in their flag. how can one see it in a different political light then?

@rodsky

i, for one, abhor the types of people who are judgemental and think highly of themselves.

[rodsky]

the swastika as a symbol for hatred will change when it's use by racist organizations has stopped. even today, neo-nazis and skin heads use the swastika as a symbol in their flag. how can one see it in a different political light then?

@rodsky

i, for one, abhor the types of people who are judgemental and think highly of themselves.

There is a need for variation--otherwise, life would be dull.

-RODION

[pnoize]

Not all variations are good.

[rodsky]

Not all variations are good.

There's the difference right there. You live in a world where things have clear cut definitions of "right" and "wrong". I tend to believe more in a world where in the natural order of things, there is no "right" and there is no "wrong"...there is only what is advantageous or disadvantageous for prolonging your existence in this world, a situation by which we as individuals, formulate our own definitions of right and wrong as we grow up.

-RODION

[pnoize]

Indeed, the difference is right there. A few posts on this thread, and you have an exact assessment of who i was. wow!

[rodsky]

Indeed, the difference is right there. A few posts on this thread, and you have an exact assessment of who i was. wow!

We aren't sitting face to face--I merely give out phrases based on input I get from the board. It doesn't necessarily mean those phrases are right or wrong, they are merely the product of digesting the info I managed to glean based on facts collected, meager as they are. Once again, have I declared them as "right" or "wrong"? Where are you pulling out this notion that whenever I whip out an observation, I am trying to label that observation as fact or the right one? I see myself as an information processor--I glean the info, compare it with stuff in my brain (processing) and churn something out--that's all there is--there is no right or wrong--that is totally up to the reader to decide.

-RODION

[pnoize]

We aren't sitting face to face--I merely give out phrases based on input I get from the board. It doesn't necessarily mean those phrases are right or wrong, they are merely the product of digesting the info I managed to glean based on facts collected, meager as they are. Once again, have I declared them as "right" or "wrong"? Where are you pulling out this notion that whenever I whip out an observation, I am trying to label that observation as fact or the right one? I see myself as an information processor--I glean the info, compare it with stuff in my brain (processing) and churn something out--that's all there is--there is no right or wrong--that is totally up to the reader to decide.

-RODION

You may have not declared them right or wrong but you have declared it as "your fact".

[rodsky]

You may have not declared them right or wrong but you have declared it as "your fact".

So I gather that all the facts I post here must agree entirely with the facts as you like to see them?

Ano bang ginawa ko sa 'yo, ha? Bakit tinututukan mo yung isyu na 'to? If this is about post #39, do know that it wasn't about you but people here that I detest, and you had absolutely no reason to spite that, because I don't detest you. 'Di ko talaga ma-gets kung bakit umabot sa ganitong punto 'tong thread na ito.

-RODION

[Ramini]

@pnoize

kbaw ka noh..by exhibitng these simple cringing and grimacing by the sight of a nazi swastika symbol is an indirect participation of what the symbol stands for..racism, discrimination..etc. you are still held up with the past..sure they killed millions pero that's the past nman nahitabo nman na that sour face of yours is still a clear message to the neo nazis that the nazi swastika symbol can still harbor racist or should we say negative emotions to the general public and is still viable in sowing discord and hatred in the world..as long as people like you continually give power to the nazi symbol..the neo nazis will still continue in using it..

[Ramini]

You may have not declared them right or wrong but you have declared it as "your fact".

dba when you say fact its synonymous to the truth dba? i think it contradicts your first neutral before sa "but" nga statement