hahay mao ni nakadaot sa mga bag ong tubo no cocky kaayo like you .... Ive been watching MJ bro since 80's so people who vote MJ are not idiots like you, who keeps on proving that .
KOBE> MJ is just hilarious.......
you cant even answer this question... which just shows how ignorant you are, and pathetic
And remember MJ also played in 2001 - 2002 were the zone defense was implemented that the thread starter said was tough. lol tsk tsk tsk
pila ave. ni MJ ? 20 ppg pila iya age - 40... the question here what if MJ was in his prime pila kaha iya ma score/ave in todays league? tubag!!!!!!!!!
answer it MR. Basketball Genius, and besides I think youve only watch the NBA During Kobes time...so its pretty clear that you are just a kobe fanatic with a low basketball IQ
you can't deny the fact that a lot of the members who participated in the polls based their decision without even analyzing and just basing their votes on popularity.
are you saying that YOU, who watches nba in your living room television have a more credible opinion than phil jackson himself? the guy who coached the two players? and you have the hypocrisy to call me "mr. basketball genius"?
gimme a break.
review the video again please.
YouTube - Phil Jackson compares Jordan and Kobe (200
There will always gonna be someone Better that Comes Along Every now and Then! it is just a matter of passing the torch.
insulto ni para kang mj na i compare cya ni kobe...tsk3x
consider this article. let's review the article about zone defense for a second. NBA's rule change for a smarter game
- That means that for the first time in 50 years, or almost since the league began, NBA teams will be allowed to play what's known as a zone defense, in which defensive players guard areas of the court.
- The existing rules require a man-to-man defense, in which the player with the ball attempts to get past a defensive player assigned to him.
- NBA is taking a hard look at the game and maybe taking a back-to-the-basics approach.
- The rule change also means that the NBA is willing to think outside the box.
- The zone defense is associated with lower scoring games and slower play, and allowing teams to use it seems almost counterintuitive for a sport already criticized for being too boring.
- The game may become more exciting in the strategic sense, but it'll lose the big plays and one-on-one matchups that defined the NBA during its most recent heyday in the 1990s.
-The advantage of the one-on-one game is that it tends to produce high-scoring games with exciting plays, like slam dunks, when the player with the ball breaks free.
- That also means that it's much harder for the offense to score--and significantly harder to score close to the goal, as with the slam dunk.
- At the same time, zone defense forces the offense to be more creative. So fans should see more movement and action on the television screen, even if the ball doesn't go up and down the court as much.
- "The idea that scoring baskets is the only way fans can enjoy basketball underestimates the intelligence(hehe this is what i'm lacking)of the fans," says Kahle. "They can enjoy the strategy.
- "The other side of the zone type defense is that it forces more outside shooting. And with more outside shooting, there'll be more missed shots, and missed shots can be exciting."
- the zone defense should provide for more unpredictability in the game.
- "With the zone, big plays would be more rare. It'll put the emphasis back on shooters, which is a lost art in the NBA."
need i say more?
lol your talking about zone defense...!!
we are talking about physicality here....!! got it??
i agree,para lang ma motivate si kobe to push harder. Daghan pa kaayo kulang si kobe. Na dala ni MJ ang Bulls sauna even di kaayo to lig-on ilang line-up.
Kobe can't stand MJ's awesomeness and that's the fact.
Kobe > MJ is like amateur > GOD.
Similar Threads |
|