
Originally Posted by
mannyamador
Whether you can feel what a woman feels is not relevant. It does not make you less worthy of making a decision. We must remain objective. I think ALL opinions on the issue are to be evaluated equally, and that of a woman should not be considered more important simply because it comes from a woman.
Also remember that no woman can feel what the unborn child feels either (and studies shown that children undergoing an abortion most likely do feel excruciating pain). If we are to consider what the woman feels, then we should also consider what the unborn child feels. An unborn child's life is still a human life. Now obviously you cannot consult the unborn child, but since generally all people (and generally all mammals too) opt for self-preservation, then we should presume that it is in the interests of the unborn child to seek life.
.
To be OBJECTIVE is the way to go. And being objective is the reason why I approved that abortion should be "legalized". Being objective is to think that having 3 bad eggs in a pack does not make you to decide to throw the dozen. Same with abortion, while killing a fetus of violation of basic human rights but, it doesn't mean that we have to neglect the benefits it can offer. So a lawmaker with an objective mind will have to think of a law that would merit the benefits of abortion out of necessity.
Legalizing means regulating. Since our country is composed of people that do not necessarily hold-on to the same religious belief, it is important that our laws are based on objective reasons that will address equally the needs of its citizen.
We do not even have to argue with your point about self-preservation and/or equal rights since we are uncomfortably on the same page.