Originally Posted by
einstein
yah.. naa right tanan gm mu veto sa trade kung feel ninyu unfair..
as long as valid ang reason..
ang UTIL is any position, so dili mu matter kung G/F/C.. ang BN kay bench.. dili mu count ang stats sa player gi butang sa bench.. gamit ni cya in case ma injured 1 ninyu nga player.. pwede ninyu diha i butang..
Thanks. That should enlighten me.
ang BN any position ra sad na? ok ra sad ko na 10 players each lang kay basin nya mga insignificant players nalang ato ma draft sa later rounds.
Actually, daghan man "sleepers", stat-filler players ato makuha for the later rounds. That's why nindot jud maghimo ug list karon kung kinsa na imo i-pick depending on your previous picks.
naa diay ta veto powers sa trade? akong reservations lang kay basin nya dili na sad cya fair kay if feel nako na ang trade between two teams would strengthen their teams more than mine, eto jud ko. naa man gud ta mga vested interests. para nako, it should be between those two teams lang..its their judgement na on how they want to improve thier teams..just my thoughts lang.
Good point again. So, uhmn, like for example, two teams agreed on a trade that involves Steve Nash for Stephon Marbury. Pwede ko mo-veto na, "this trade does not make sense!", even though both camps think of it as the trade of the century?