wala tay mahims ila man na...
we all take sides and we defend our sides.. the way i see it, nothing will change.. you watch GMA, we watch ABS.. let the two stations handle the case.. ngano gud tawn magsakit inyong dughan.. not unless you were given P500 pesos and groceries..
kung taga-an kog 500 + groceries from either networks kay dawaton nako...maayo nalang kay naay ikasnax kung mo tan-aw kog HBO or NatGeo heheheheOriginally Posted by bugloy
haha... gma and abs 'fanboys'.
both those stations have their own covert operations and dirty tactics. you can't say gma is clean, and neither can you say the same for abs.
well anyway, its up to the court to decide on who really is at fault here. all of us are mere watchers of the said case, and we do not have the expertise on these kind of things. as far as i am concerned, only the court can point out the station in the wrong.
::OPINIONS
OT--maypa ang cable, daghan channel
ahehehe, relax bro. ahehe.Originally Posted by szichri
i think ikaw ang wala nag basa. i will tell you. the title of this thread is "ratings issue between abs and gma".
does your so called evidence coincide with this topic? ahehehe.
and iam expecting you not to reply again anything against this issue, because if you are one of the pro ABS, you are not following the court TRO order? ahehehe.
Mulang. How very true. ABS cannot understand the meaning of a TRO.Originally Posted by brownprose
Ang ako ikasulti ani is very simple.... Lain nga thread, hahahahahaha ky kani nga thread is about ratings issue between gma and abs. dili gma and inq7.netOriginally Posted by szichri
hehehe...ABS must have taken the TRO wrongly to mean TURN RATINGS OFF against GMA.Originally Posted by pijavier
HAHAHAHAHA, a good one. nice joke!Originally Posted by brownprose
Kapuso is great!
which part of the TRO was taken wrongly?Originally Posted by brownprose
for you what was the TRO means?
Similar Threads |
|