insulting!
grabiha sad nang 5k pesos oi, lisud naman gyud na antuson...
nope, that's not it. you ARE ALREADY in business. your product/service is the one you're giving your company.Originally Posted by BoyasBabis
That won't happen here. inhuman ra kaayo na gibuhat sa wats.Originally Posted by ronna
and 5k per agent? damn, gitamakan naman tawn ta ana oi.
Nice suggestion. hehehehe...Originally Posted by Velvett
iSTORYA.net Sitewide Forum Rules
Buy/Sell/Trade/Classifieds Forum Rules
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it.
Originally Posted by Velvett
this could be a misleading premise. employment and entrepreneurship or business are two different things, period. the tenure and compensation alone spells a lot of difference.
as of the moment, the management is looking for ways for an agent to be dismissed. damn this company, if ing-ani ra ka saun mangita ug trabaho these days, why would we want to stay if we are being treated this way. hahay.... laliman ka we have to hit a 100% attendance every month or i think that was bi-monthly cz if not that will be 1st offense (suspension for more or less 3 days!) and then not only that, ur still going to think about ur productivity as well! and there's a lot more crap pa na buhaton ning management. atay kaau...
@Lytslpr
i've been to both sides of the table, and i don't see any conflict with a mindset like that. in fact, staffers who hold themselves self-responsible, proactive, and confident on their services appear more like business partners than employees. and isn't it what they say during orientations? "you are our partners in success...blah blah blah."
so i highly suggest employees act like partners and not slaves. that's what the mindset is all about.
your right velvett agents should also do something on there side to make the company work dili lang unta sila mag think na gi da-0g da-og sila sa company if mag impose ug new rule that will lead to termination kung dili ma sunod.
Originally Posted by Velvett
i exactly got your point the first time but the thing is that is not true. that is what the companies would like the employees to believe but you and i and everybody knows that is nothing but a bunch of corporate image packaging BS delivered by HR.
an employee cannot say that he is engaged in business with his employer because he is offering his talents, skills and services in exchange for monetary compensation because his status, terms, conditions, tenure and pay is totally different. my point is an employee is an employee and a businessman is a businessman, it's black and white. now, the premise that an employee should perceive as if he is in business with the corporation/company will only make it confusingly grey.
sometimes there is a thin line between mindset and denial. i'd rather be a realist than an optimist.
Originally Posted by mique
spit it out my dear! BPO people talk about it anyway in starbucks or if they already had a few too many at the clubs. just be safe, don't post from your workstation.
Similar Threads |
|