Who's the most corrupt Philippine President ever SURVEY!

[godsaint]

---

Its Gloria 3 years breaking the record of 20 years by Marcos

[wh3ng2004]

mao bah? tnood ni? sure oi..hehehe mrag dolut man sa bukog imo klagot ni gloria dah...hehe

[radiostar]

erap may be corrupt, but gloria is more corrupt

[wh3ng2004]

btaw bro wla may dili corrupt cguro karon panahuna bsan ako nman cguro ma presidente oi..

[balatucan]

I know where this topic is going. GMA will come out as the least corrupt President in contrast to the Pulse Asia survey where she is perceived as the most corrupt.

There is no pint discussing it here. The people has spoken. GMA is the most corrupt President.

I hope this topic will be deleted.

[jong_lloyd]

pinaka corrupt si marcos oi.. if basa mu articles about ka marcos sa iya time maka ingon gyud mu nga siya ang pinaka corrupt. like sa iya Swiss bank account niya pila to ka milyon dollars nga bawionon sa atong government.

[necrotic freak]

Its Gloria 3 years breaking the record of 20 years by Marcos

Marcos parin! mao ni founder sa kurakot.. na influence nalang na ang mga predecessors niya...

[godsaint]

I know also that this topic against Gloria will be deleted.Just like other thread.they can delete this thread but they cant deny the truth.gloria and her administration are worst than both Marcos and Erap!

[edgeknife]

GMA is no. 1...

[giddyboy]

Pahibalo lng bro godsaint ba:

when u post a new topic or poll, just make sure the thread starter (like u) is not making their first statements biased. mao na pasabot sa atoang moderators bro.

here's a tip:

(1) make the title first (concise, factual, w/o any room for malice, bias, and prejudice). and make sure ur topic is not already posted (or related ) previously by another istoryan. dat way, u will not risk merging of ur topic to another.

(2) then make an explanation of facts, starts like:

"The Pulse Asia Survey said that GMA is perceived to be the most corrupt...blah,blah..."
"what do u think this means?"

it doesnt matter if u copy/paste it as long as it is factual or neutral in scope...then you can leave an open question/s for all istoryans to answer, discuss, react, etc...

(3) when all is ready, istoryans can then discuss, debate, exchange opinions, including you.

if my opinion on this matter still perplexes you, the istoryan moderators are very much available to explain how...
dat way, u will not risk on double-posting of threads, and perhaps risk erasure of ur entire thread.
im not a moderator (i dont even know how it works technically), but i am jst helping u out as a fellow istoryan.
and pls dont get the impression that the mods are biased. it's unfair to them coz u can always ask the reasons why. tnx...