Again, accountability system does not equate exactly to "filing a complaint against an employee". I have been answering your question, "refer to your lawyer on how to file a case". As for Accountability System, please stop insisting your version of it. The Narco List has an accountability system which you can always ask your lawyers on how to proceed. Obvious ba na dili dyod na mu hatag ug name kay ila nang i-trace back kinsa nag hatag sa imung name and provide sanctions then provide compensation sa offended party? Unless ganahan nasad ka ron sa name sa tanan nag investigate and kinsa ilang gipang submit.
As stated in this link: Prosecutor in drug row to file libel raps vs PDEA execs, media shows na naay accountability system. Now, where is YOUR proof na walay accountability system?
Again, you have not proven na Black Propaganda ang Narco List other than parroting the same question. I've provided arguments against your claims. You just chose to ignore them. You said hearsay sila mao na Black Propaganda and I countered that with asking for proof na hearsay dyod when there are 4 independent agencies investigating and validating the list. My basis is how official organizations work and how these multiple independent agencies publicly acknowledged that they created that list.
In short, you think it is blind faith to believe a list created by 4 independent agencies and validated the list. Seems like, mas swito pa d.i ka keysa aning 4 ka agencies na specialized and trained for such work. And since mas sweto paman ka, I will let you continue with your kind of logic for the next 3 years.
Last edited by obelisk; 04-29-2019 at 05:13 PM.
4 'independent agencies' ang nag-'validate' YET wala'y criminal case nga ilang napasaka sa korte kay sila mismo ni-admit nga KULANG ang ebidensya?
Ang proof nga hearsay ang maong narco list naa ra mismo sa imong post. Pero nagpabuta-2x lang ka.
Blind faith gyud nang imo, oy. Bisan unsaon pa nimog ligwat2x. Kay ang PNP mismo mi-admit nga WALA'Y IGONG ebidensya para makapasakahan og criminal complaint ning mga naa sa narco list.
Pero ikaw, mamugos gyud ka nga DUNA'Y ebidensya.PNP: Not enough evidence to file criminal raps based on Duterte list
https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/109642...n-duterte-list
Bwahahahaha!
Nakig-debate na siya sa iyang kaugalingon.
VERSUS
Sakit gyud na ninyong mga DDS nga i-contradict ninyo inyong mga kaugalingong gisulti, bradier, 'sa?
By the way, unsa gani na nga year nahitabo kanang imong gi-cite nga news? SA TIME SA DUTERTE ADMIN BA NA NAHITABO?
Tug-an lang gud sa tinuod. Ayaw ka-ulaw kay dili lagi ko magsaba sa uban.
Sa Duterte admin ba nahitabo kanang imong news diin ang PDEA gipakasuhan og libel?
Kay ang accountability man sa PDEA nga involved sa narco list ni Duterte ang atong gi-debatihan diri. Dili man ang PDEA sa previous admins.
Last edited by boss_digong; 04-29-2019 at 05:43 PM.
I do apologize if dili ka makasabot sa point nako. Let me lower the level down for you. Accountability System sa Narcolist is PDEA and the other agencies involved. If they provide false claims then their agencies will sanction the one who provided the name and validated the name. That link I provided shows it is possible and there is a way to file a case for libel. Or basin dili lng dyod ka mu basa sa links akong gi provide para naa kay argument. Or you deny it outright just because imung gipangayo dyod is "name".
Gi tubag nako imung question. Consult your nearest lawyer. You do not ask a random person how an agency works internally.
This will be my last reply since, again, mas sweto paman d.i ka keysa mga agencies kay chismis sila. You accuse the 4 agencies of hearsay without even proof na hearsay sila. Goes to show ikaw ang walay basis sa imung gipangsulti. I will let you go on and continue for another 3 years.
Naay target pero 2 years na wala man gihapon... hmmm ngano man kaha @firestarter ?
Similar Threads |
|