All About Current Admin of Duterte

[johnjob]

---

Kinsa si abnoy? Kinsa'y nag-ingon nimo nga idol na ko sya? Ikaw man siguro maoy lagpas kaayo'g pangutok.

Kun maayong tawo gyud ning imong idol, solbaron niya ang problema nga walay daghang istorya. Dili kay manghagit siya'g gyera sa Canada. Kay wala gani siya ka-ako og sukol sa China nga klaro na kaayong nangilog sa atong mga resources sa panatag shoal.

Tan-awa di ba tungod anang iyang recent nga trash talk, nahimo na sad laughing stock ang mga pinoy sa laing mga nasud.

Pa as if pud ka wala kahibawo unsay history kaning problema sa WPS ug basura sa canada. 3 years pa more.

[firestarter]

Control F sa imo March 5 link:

“Moreover, the constitutional presumption of innocence – to my mind and to the President’s mind – have been waived by reason of their running for public office; because when you run for public office, everything is a fair game – you open yourself to criticism… kakalkalin lahat iyong buhay mo diyan. So noong pumasok sila diyan, they already take the risk of being exposed if they are involved.

So, sa tingin namin eh hindi mag-a-apply iyong presumption of innocence. At kahit nga magdemanda sila ng libel, baka malabo rin sapagkat ang libel kailangan may malicious intent – eh ito hindi eh. Kasi kaya nire-release ‘yan, para malaman ng taumbayan at ng mga botante na itong mga taong ito, na nakalista rito eh ang sumisira sa ating bayan. Karapatan nilang malaman iyon, and it is the duty of the state to preserve itself.”

Well, if mao na ang naa sa ilang mind, then so be it. Panelo is right though, that they can always go to court.

With regards to your claim on why it doesn't apply to Polong. It is because Polong was not implicated by PDEA. I think ana ra.

By the way, enlighten me, drug lord diay si polong?

[firestarter]

Naunsa nani karon. Na trace naman nila ug kinsa or asa gikan ang Bikoy Videos.

Who is behind Metro Balita?
BY SASS ROGANDO SASOT

APRIL 25, 2019

HOME / OPINION / OP-ED COLUMNS / WHO IS BEHIND METRO BALITA?

SASS ROGANDO SASOT
AS April kicked in, the black propaganda against the Duterte administration was all out. In a series of YouTube videos titled “Ang Totoong Narcolist,” an anonymous informant named “Bikoy” alleged that members of the Duterte family were receiving payouts from an unknown drug syndicate. Metrobalita.net was implicated by both Dr. Dante Ang and columnist Rigoberto Tiglao as the first website to circulate those videos, in separate articles published on April 22, 2019 in The Manila Times. Neither of them mentioned who was behind that website. This column will fill in the gap.

As Tiglao wrote, the owner of metrobalita.net had ads on its website. Some of them were from Google. To allow Google to post ads, publishers must include the AdSense ID in the HTML code of their websites. The AdSense ID is a unique identifier Google assigns to publishers. This can be publicly seen on the source code of every website. And there are online tools available to trace which other websites — past and present — used that code.



Metrobalita.net’s AdSense ID is 9287075011637877. Some of my readers were able to trace all the websites bearing that ID, which eventually led us to the identity of the person behind metrobalita.net. Out of fear for their lives, they asked me not to disclose the identities revealed.

Google AdSense ID 9287075011637877 can also be seen in another online version of Metro Balita, when it was still a dot com instead of a dot net website. The domain registrant of the old dot com version is Rodel Jayme. This information is publicly accessible via WHOXY, an online tool that reveals the domain registration records of websites.

In the June 5, 2017 archive copy of 電気屋で買える美顔器おすすめ (https://tinyurl.com/metrobalitaarchived), one can read an explanation of what Metro Balita is:

“Ang METRO BALITA ay inilunsad upang maghatid ng mga mahahalagang balita mula sa iba’t ibang panig ng Pilipinas maging sa ibayong dagat.”

(Metro Balita was established to deliver important news from different parts of the Philippines, as well as from overseas.)



Interestingly, Metro Balita included fighting fake news as one of its objectives.



That explanation was signed, “RJ (METRO Balita Founder).”

The shadow of yellow
Jayme was one of the volunteers of the Mar Roxas-Leni Robredo 2016 campaign. “Have you met someone who purely dedicated all his time to campaigning for Mar Roxas?” introduced his profile in the blog Volunteers Behind Mar and Leni (https://volunteers4marleni.wordpress.com/).



His co-volunteer is another familiar name — Pete Silva — exposed by political blogger RJ Nieto (aka Thinking Pinoy) in January 2017 (“Inside Leni Robredo’s international propaganda machinery”). Silva was actively circulating a document detailing the social media strategy of the Office of the Vice President to attack the critics of Robredo, as well as Bongbong Marcos and his son Sandro. Robredo was heavily criticized in December 2016 when she chose to go on vacation in the United States while her hometown was being ravaged by Typhoon Nina.

Jayme’s involvement with the Yellows is actually older than that. Several posts in a Facebook page called “The Aquino Legacy” (@aquinolegacy) identified Jayme as one of its admins. Examples of such posts are: June 22, 2015 — http://www.facebook.com/aquinolegacy...0136716544175; and on Jan. 10, 2016, where Jayme was giving instructions to those who would like to be volunteers for the Roxas-Robredo 2016 campaign — https://www.facebook.com/aquinolegac...61377480753431.



This page was created on Feb. 26, 2015 to support the Aquino family. This year, it has been actively campaigning for the reelection of Sen. Bam Aquino. It has also been actively supporting the Senate run of Robredo’s election lawyer, Romulo Macalintal. This devotion to Macalintal was also observed by Tiglao in the postings and ads displayed by metrobalita.net.

Test Article 154
Article 154 of the Revised Penal Code punishes “any person who by means of printing, lithography, or any other means of publication shall publish or cause to be published as news any false news which may endanger the public order, or cause damage to the interest or credit of the State.”

Evidence is now mounting against the veracity of the claims made in the “Bikoy” videos, which was peddled by Jayme’s Metro Balita as “news.” Through fake bank documents, the Bikoy videos portrayed rural banks as remiss in their duties in flagging dubious transactions. One of these banks was the Rural Bank of Guinobatan in Albay.



On April 23, 2019, after I wrote an open letter to it, the Rural Bank of Guinobatan issued a statement on their Facebook Page which “categorically denies that it has existing bank accounts with the number combinations mentioned and that any of the alleged transactions never happened involving RBGI as mentioned in the videos.”

Thus, the Bikoy videos, enabled by Jayme’s Metro Balita, didn’t just spread false, malicious, and defamatory stories against private and public individuals, they also tarnished the credibility of our banking system.

Isn’t this damaging the interest of the State? Perhaps it’s time to have a test case on Article 154.

srsasot@gmail.com

[necrotic freak]

^^Let's see unsa napod theory aning propagandist diri

[firestarter]

Drug lord siya as of now, unless he proves his innocence. To use Duterte’s standard. Guilt before proven innocent.

That's your opinion though, you're entitled to it.

Although I think, nga basin naay evidence ang PDEA that implicates those people in the drug list, thus they made it in the list.

[firestarter]

With regards to validation.

https://www.asianjournal.com/philipp...on-narco-list/

Who validated the list?

DILG Undersecretary Jonathan Malaya explained that the list was validated by officials from the PDEA-led Interagency Committee on Anti-illegal Drugs (ICAD).

Among those were from the Philippine National Police (PNP), the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP), and the National Intelligence Coordinating Agency (NICA).

Malaya emphasized that the list compiled names of politicians who were vetted, verified and agreed upon by all four agencies.

“If there is one or two agencies that do not agree, we remove the name. Only those names upon which all four agreed were included in this initial batch. There are still other names which are currently being investigated and validated,” Malaya explained.

“I think, three years since the President came into power, we already have enough evidences to file against them. Given that the President has given the directive, we have no choice but to file the charges,” he added.

[firestarter]

^^Let's see unsa napod theory aning propagandist diri

I previously tried blogging, tinuod gyud ni nga mag need ka ug tinuod nga name gamiton para sa adsense, kay dili man nimo ma withdraw ang money nga nisulod sa imong account through ads kung dili tinuod nga bank account.

Although, pwede ka mogamit ug lain nga email address, pero dapat tinuod gyud nga bank account ang imong gamiton, and kana na nga email address ang i link sa imong bank account.

Nagka greedy tingale nang tawhana maong gi monetize gyud ang iyang webpage.. ahaha.. sakpan hinuon. Bisan pa moingon siya nga dili siya ang nag upload. The fact that iyaha nga webpage ang gigamit, means naa siyay accountability.

Maglisod na gyud nas Jayme ug lusot ana ba.

[johnjob]

Seen Mode ang nagtubag tubag sa iyang kaugalingon no.1 propagandist dere.

[obelisk]

Asa sad ko ni mention na naa? Again, different could either mean naa, pero different. Or wala, mao nang different.

The link says that, but is it really true? Who can they seek redress against? Please name just ONE person they can validly file a criminal complaint against. JUST ONE boss.

Again, on what grounds can you say hearsay or black propaganda ang Narco List? Issued close to elections. Just like "Totoong"

What proof do you have na walay nag file ug complaint? https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/109642...n-duterte-list

What proof do you have na wala silay objective standard when they are trained for such tasks? No criminal complaint filed. If naa'y objective standard, naa na unta na sa korte.

Why is Totoong Narco List only targeted at the president's family? Maybe because that was the purpose of their study? Who knows.

Kinsa man accountable if ever sayop ang list? I do not know who.

Naay objective standard gi follow ang Totoong Narco list? I do not know.

------------
Boss, murag naglibog ka. Wala ko ni ingon na legit ang Totoong Narco list. Far from it. Ni ingon ka na they are very similar to the Narcolist provided by the President in a sense na propaganda silang duha.

I answered your questions. Now maybe time mo answer ka sa ako for a change?

Go back the statement I quoted. Different does not mean na "wala". You don't say "They have a different vehicle" then wala d.i vehicle. You simply say "they dont have a vehicle".

Grounds... plural. Usa ra imung grounds. Narco Lists were released a couple of times, with one dating March 18 last year. Sorry pero the link you provided kay mu ad2 sa home page sa Inquirer. Not sure if nawala ang article or na error ang URL.

Your objective standard only applies to filing a case. We are talking about objective standards in putting their names on the list.

Unlike the Narco List, which has an accountability system. Totoong Narco List does not. There not even a "face" to identify who the publisher is. Hence, Black propaganda. And na sugod naman ug ka trace kinsa ang nag release ato. Gi quote na ni @firestarter. We shall see how this black propaganda goes.

[GemWArrioR]

Asa sad ko ni mention na naa? Again, different could either mean naa, pero different. Or wala, mao nang different.

The link says that, but is it really true? Who can they seek redress against? Please name just ONE person they can validly file a criminal complaint against. JUST ONE boss.

Again, on what grounds can you say hearsay or black propaganda ang Narco List? Issued close to elections. Just like "Totoong"

What proof do you have na walay nag file ug complaint? https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/109642...n-duterte-list

What proof do you have na wala silay objective standard when they are trained for such tasks? No criminal complaint filed. If naa'y objective standard, naa na unta na sa korte.

Why is Totoong Narco List only targeted at the president's family? Maybe because that was the purpose of their study? Who knows.

Kinsa man accountable if ever sayop ang list? I do not know who.

Naay objective standard gi follow ang Totoong Narco list? I do not know.

------------
Boss, murag naglibog ka. Wala ko ni ingon na legit ang Totoong Narco list. Far from it. Ni ingon ka na they are very similar to the Narcolist provided by the President in a sense na propaganda silang duha.

I answered your questions. Now maybe time mo answer ka sa ako for a change?

this is the proof that this troll and that boss_digong is one and the same.