Originally Posted by
LogicPlease
I doubt Boracays problem lies solely on the resorts, those establishments have septic tanks, the problem is the government, they don't provide proper sewage system in the island, that's why many have no where to connect there septic tanks. Waste water ended up in the underground aquifers then to the sea.
I understand its very costly for the govt to build a proper sewage system in a island but is it an excuse to blame the resorts??
And besides we only see a few establishments who violated easement rules, most like 90% of them don't, sounds like stupid to close Boracay, make all businesses suffer from the failure of the few, and end losing billions of income, including hundreds maybe thousands jobless. Is it really that difficult to isolate those violators and make them pay??
I would beg to disagree bro.
On Easements:
Article 51 of the Water Code of the Philippines states that “The banks of rivers and streams and the shores of the seas and lakes throughout their entire length and within a zone of three (3) meters in urban area,
twenty meters in agricultural areas and forty (40) meters in forest areas, along their margins, are subject to the easement of public use in the interest of recreation, navigation, flotage, fishing and salvage. No person shall be allowed to stay in this zone longer than what is necessary for recreation, navigation, flotage, fishing or salvage or to build structures of any kind.
Ang Boracay island was declared forest and agricultural land. see here:
https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2...e-court-ruling
MANILA, Philippines — The government has every right to close down Boracay Island, based on existing jurisprudence by the Supreme Court (SC) that declared the famous tourist destination as state-owned.
An October 2008 decision of the SC had classified the island as both forest and agricultural land that belongs to the government as it junked ownership claims by several resort owners.
The ruling, which stands as it has not been appealed or reconsidered, could provide legal justification to the six-month closure ordered by Malacañang for the rehabilitation of the island.
Unless and until ma declare na otherwise, it will forever remain agricultural and forest land.
Sa 30 to 40 meters nga easements.. I think halos tanan kanang duol sa dagat nga establishment ang nakaviolate ana, mao tong nag start na silag panirado ura mismo because it was obviously a clear violation... Besides those establishments who think they are not violating anything, they can always file an injunction order.
Obviously naay problema diha sa Local Government sa Boracay.. Kana nga problema actually has been tackled every year since pana naka remember ko nga naa nanang Boracay ni sikat.. and that was 25 years ago.
Daghan na kaayong nang istorya anang hugaw ang Boracay unya na puno nanag tae ug mga algae. I was aghast when I went there and saw the water nga although limpyo tanawon dili na gyud siya crystal clear as what I've heared several years since.
Karon ra gyud nga administration ang naay political will that decided to do something about it. If someone is to blame, blame it on the local government in Boracay, the past administrations that didn't do anything about it, and the local resorts who were supposed to be the stewards of their own product.