nahan rako makahibaw sa imo edad boss. one thing gud dali raman kaayo pagsulti nga maayo imo kinabuhi sa una kaysa sa karon.
if bata paka ato panahuna wa paka nag work, syempre maayo imo kinabuhi nagdawat ra gud ka kwarta, pinakaon ka sa imo ginikanan.
if nag work naka ato panahuna, nahan ko makahibaw diha nga part. kay based sa akong ginikanan, that time lisud pangita trabaho.
yes maayo economy but it was all a sham, maayo GDP nato ato nga time because of heavy borrowing and heavy spending. but never translated to the aleviation of the poor. after marcos left the government, didto na nakita ang tae. due to heavy borrowing, inflation sky rocketed. then succeeding government were cash strapped kay ang kadako sa budget will be allocated to paying the debt.
ingon ani nalang. nag work naka ato nga time boss? nahan rako makahibaw sa imo perspective ato nga time.
So bali anti Marcos ka ato bro unya pro Aquino ka?
I'm just trying to establish ug asa ang imong basihan para mag ka istorya tag tarong.
Lisod pud kaayo basihan nimo ang edad just to discredit someone's claim.
Ani nalang.
I'm not a Marcos defender, however, but if imong i compare ang pamaagi ni Marcos vs. ni Cory ug noynoy. The latter lags significantly.
im not both boss. kinahanglan diay label?lol. i did my research on marcos martial law era, it was my project in college. it wasn't good.
im not basing you age boss. im basin your capability to prove your claim. thats why ako gi rephrase ako question if nag work naka ato nga time. kay you claim you had better life before than now. my parents and grandparents were different kay lisud pangita work ato nga time.
as far as i know the only people who had better lives that time martial-law marcos era, were people who worked in the government. which is why i was asking you if you are working at that time. if you were working for the government that time then you might had a better life that time.
palihug daw ko compare imo situation sa una boss ug karon ngano mas nindut imo kinabuhi. this is very interesting to me.
it is very different reading books as to the experiences of people during that era.
Bro, basin nalimot ka nga akong gi compare ang situation sa pagdala ni Marcos ug pagdala ni noynoy ug cory, or was that in another thread.
So you think maayo ang dagan sa panahon ni Cory?
- - - Updated - - -
Aahhhh ang imo diay nga gi quote ang akong "karon", putol2x diay murag inquirer.
Hahaha..
Sige bro, let me qualify my statement..
ang Karon akong pasabot ana boss.. "Panahon na ni noynoy" bro.
sarry.. tao lang po..
Last edited by firestarter; 02-13-2018 at 11:17 AM.
Bro, we must also consider nga dili ni tanan trabaho sa President. Like sa imong number 1.
Sa panahon ni noynoy, bisan nag kagidlay na ang internal affairs sa Pilipinas, SAF44, innocent people getting robbed, mugged on the streets, apil pa gani ang mga bata nga way buot rape-on. The country's GDP was still robust, ni peak bato one time at 7%, and we even made it to the number 2 spot.
On no. 2 economic policies does not necessarily mean we will depend on one country (US and the it's little brown brothers - as quoted from a statement), means nga maayo na dayon ang dagan sa GDP, even karon nga ang atong economic policies are veering away from exclusive to inclusive growth, and veering away from the US mindset, to other countries like Russia and China, our economy is still robust. Daghan factors ana, noynoy obvious was not that good of a President as compared to digong, or Gloria, pero our economy remained robust in it's growth.
3. Calamities labi na ang mga force majeur, some others call it acts of God - are not dependent on the President
4. Kanus-a paman na walay turmoil ang politika.
What I'm aiming at is that GDP is not dependent on the President or his acts alone. Yes, he could influence it, but it is not his sole responsibility or act alone.
Naa pud na mga economic factors to consider.
Similar Threads |
|