Aw lisod pud kaayo sir i limit nato ang atong discussion to Congress when we have already explored the entire world of law and politics, ni abot na gani kas ROC.. nga wala pata didto.
Not defensive sir.. Again just merely stating facts of events which really actually happened.
But to satisfy your question sir.
The act of Congress alone does not constitute Constructive Abolishment of the CHR.. It is merely an act of a the legislature to do checks and balances to an institution's head it deemed politically biased..
But then again I have already answered this and violated my last statement not to answer this again..
Bali ikaduhang MR nani sir.
- - - Updated - - -
Bitaw sir..
I think we have come to a point where neither parties agree on a single thing..
I say this is not constructive abolishment, you'd say this is.
I say this CHR's constitutional mandate is to the people in general you'd say, it is up to them to choose which area to focus.
I say this is political in nature you'd say this is judicial.
I say we base this argument on Constitutional grounds you'd say Rules of Court applies,
I say Human Rights Victims can go to PAO, you'd say they can't.
I say Chito Gascon is biased towards LP, you'd say he is not.
I think this ends here.
And let the due course takes it turn.