Page 1466 of 1835 FirstFirst ... 145614631464146514661467146814691476 ... LastLast
Results 14,651 to 14,660 of 18341
  1. #14651

    Duterte slams CHR chief: Are you a pedophile? | Headlines, News, The Philippine Star | philstar.com
    di siguro pwede ma chief sa chr if suspected nga pedo

  2. #14652
    C.I.A. firestarter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    3,395
    Blog Entries
    9
    Quote Originally Posted by slakker View Post
    Alams na gamiton na pud nis international media nga statement para ingnon anti LGBT nis digong.. magrally na pud sila.. ahaha

    Ganahan ko mabalo-an ug unsay move nila karon September 21.. kitang katag ug unsa sila ka daghan.. Mag apil2x raba ang mga NPA/ communists.
    Last edited by firestarter; 09-18-2017 at 04:09 PM.

  3. #14653
    Quote Originally Posted by firestarter View Post

    You do know that it was Alvarez and a lot more congressmen who had thrown allegations against him right? ... Did you ever hear Alvarez's allegations against him?
    Alvarez' or the House of Reps' credibility is a point of personal opinion. For me, they will never do anything that is not for their personal interest. So, if Gascon is taking the heat from them, then yes, I believe that is based on their selfish interests e.g., political self-preservation. They have been known to say stuff on a whim. Although that is my opinion, it is a FACT that no hard evidence was presented to prove Alvarez' point. It was all allegations. Unya karun, si Gascon na nuon imong ipa prove otherwise?

    How can you answer a political question in a judicious manner? .. simple you can't.

    Do you think Alvarez throwing allegations against the leader of CHR are at a whim?
    You can. Presumption of innocence and presumption of regularity. That is how you answer political questions.

    Additionally, pwede nimo ma argue na dili ni siya political question but instead question of law, since constructive abolishment naman ni of a Constitutional body.

  4. #14654
    C.I.A. firestarter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    3,395
    Blog Entries
    9
    Quote Originally Posted by disk88 View Post
    Alvarez' or the House of Reps' credibility is a point of personal opinion. For me, they will never do anything that is not for their personal interest. So, if Gascon is taking the heat from them, then yes, I believe that is based on their selfish interests e.g., political self-preservation. They have been known to say stuff on a whim. Although that is my opinion, it is a FACT that no hard evidence was presented to prove Alvarez' point. It was all allegations. Unya karun, si Gascon na nuon imong ipa prove otherwise?



    You can. Presumption of innocence and presumption of regularity. That is how you answer political questions.

    Additionally, pwede nimo ma argue na dili ni siya political question but instead question of law, since constructive abolishment naman ni of a Constitutional body.
    You're arguments are for the courts sir.

    If you don't like the administration you can always attend the September 21, 2017 Anti-Martial rally.. Hope to see you there..

  5. #14655
    Quote Originally Posted by firestarter View Post
    You're arguments are for the courts sir.

    If you don't like the administration you can always attend the September 21, 2017 Anti-Martial rally.. Hope to see you there..
    That's because I prefer to use logical arguments.

    Nope, I have better things to do with my time. Also, just because I despise the Congress doesnt mean I hate the administration in its entirety.

  6. #14656
    C.I.A. firestarter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    3,395
    Blog Entries
    9
    Quote Originally Posted by disk88 View Post
    Alvarez' or the House of Reps' credibility is a point of personal opinion. For me, they will never do anything that is not for their personal interest. So, if Gascon is taking the heat from them, then yes, I believe that is based on their selfish interests e.g., political self-preservation. They have been known to say stuff on a whim. Although that is my opinion, it is a FACT that no hard evidence was presented to prove Alvarez' point. It was all allegations. Unya karun, si Gascon na nuon imong ipa prove otherwise?



    You can. Presumption of innocence and presumption of regularity. That is how you answer political questions.

    Additionally, pwede nimo ma argue na dili ni siya political question but instead question of law, since constructive abolishment naman ni of a Constitutional body.
    Presumption of innocence and presumption of regularity are for the courts. Political questions are answered through voting by majority as that is how democracy works.

    The Presumption of innocence and presumption of regularity are for the checks and balances by the courts. .

    Mao bitaw ingon ko nga dapat iya usa tong klarohon ang allegations thrown at him by Alvarez and the majority of the Congress.

    Granting they are for their own interests, what makes you think that Gascon is not for his? .. But then again that's just editorial as what Gordon would put it.

    Again and again para dili ta magtuyok2x...

    Allegations are thrown at the leadership... and not the CHR itself... if you might have remembered and have heard from the side of the congressmen..

    They have always stressed that it is about the leadership not the commission.. Resign , so we can talk about revising the budget...
    I don't think there is constructive abolishment here.. It is merely an exercise of checks and balances....

    Why would you feed a dog who bites your hand?? But then again.. it's just my opinion ... even if he is actually bleeding and stabbing this administration.

    Checks and balances.. that's the keyword here.

  7. #14657
    Quote Originally Posted by firestarter View Post
    Presumption of innocence and presumption of regularity are for the courts. Political questions are answered through voting by majority as that is how democracy works.

    The Presumption of innocence and presumption of regularity are for the checks and balances by the courts. .

    Mao bitaw ingon ko nga dapat iya usa tong klarohon ang allegations thrown at him by Alvarez and the majority of the Congress.

    Granting they are for their own interests, what makes you think that Gascon is not for his? .. But then again that's just editorial as what Gordon would put it.

    Those are not for the courts alone. Ever heard of the expanded concept of judicial review? Since I presume naka Consti 1 and 2 ka, then yes, you probably have. Ang consequence anang expanded concept is that the rules of court apply when there is a danger to the Constitution.

    Again and again para dili ta magtuyok2x...

    Allegations are thrown at the leadership... and not the CHR itself... if you might have remembered and have heard from the side of the congressmen..

    They have always stressed that it is about the leadership not the commission.. Resign , so we can talk about revising the budget...
    I don't think there is constructive abolishment here.. It is merely an exercise of checks and balances....

    Why would you feed a dog who bites your hand?? But then again.. it's just my opinion ... even if he is actually bleeding and stabbing this administration.

    Checks and balances.. that's the keyword here.
    Allegations are thrown at the leadership but you punish the entire CHR. You think that makes sense? If you are not for a higher level of discourse and democracy, then why are you still in this country? This is not how you do checks and balances. There is a proper procedure to follow in case there is grave abuse of discretion on the part of Gascon. But the Congress have nothing to show, hence they resort to bullying. Kibaw ka kinsay luoy? Ang mga tao na nangailanga sa CHR.

    P.S., that "dog" you are talking about is a Constitutional body. Congress is mandated to "feed" it. If they want to kill the "dog" by taking it out from the Constitution, they can. But until they do that, they cannot constructively abolish it.

  8. #14658
    Quote Originally Posted by disk88 View Post
    If they want to kill the "dog" by taking it out from the Constitution, they can. But until they do that, they cannot constructively abolish it.
    Lets say Congress managed to removed CHR from the constitution, does it bring more good than bad?. If yes then Im all for removal of CHR in the constitution.

  9. #14659
    Quote Originally Posted by ComeToPapa View Post
    Lets say Congress managed to removed CHR from the constitution, does it bring more good than bad?. If yes then Im all for removal of CHR in the constitution.

    In my opinion, it can only lead to bad.

  10. #14660
    Puros jud way ayo ang balita sa crappler, abs cbn og uban pang y ayo nga media.
    karong tuiga wala jud ko kadungog og ingon ani nga balita gikan ana nila.
    walay pang boost morale puros pang daot imong madunggan sa mga kanahan

    First batch of dressed chicken from Duterte arrives in Marawi - The Filipino Times

  11.    Advertisement

Similar Threads

 
  1. All about the Goodness of WebXpress
    By iLoveWebX4ever in forum General Discussions
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 03-10-2012, 05:02 AM
  2. ~All about GEARS OF WAR!~
    By obemon in forum Software & Games (Old)
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 07-16-2008, 11:47 AM
  3. ~All About AGE OF EMPIRES!~
    By a0201 in forum Software & Games (Old)
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 11-30-2007, 06:50 AM
  4. Replies: 110
    Last Post: 06-22-2007, 10:54 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
about us
We are the first Cebu Online Media.

iSTORYA.NET is Cebu's Biggest, Southern Philippines' Most Active, and the Philippines' Strongest Online Community!
follow us
#top