sunod polisiya e implement.kinahanglan wala nay mga kilay ang mga estudyante!uyon mo?
sunod polisiya e implement.kinahanglan wala nay mga kilay ang mga estudyante!uyon mo?
you're old enough broOriginally Posted by pringhouls
wala ka kibaw ang today's carolinian kay ma.oy pinaka ka prestigious na campus paper dire sa visayas? or not sa whole philippines?Originally Posted by dubioz
school organ? please... it's a disgrace na tawgon ang today's carolinian na school organ kay ang school organ pang high school rana
and yes... you mentioned use your imagination pud, when funds were low, we just printed the whole thing in one broadsheet size page, then posted them in public places. Your first article could be, "CONTRIBUTE TO THE REVIVAL/CREATION OF A SCHOOL ORGAN".
naka kita ko ani na ila nani gibuhat... pero gipang tang tang sa guard ang gi pang post
Ever since they ransacked/raided/abolished the CNMS I've lost faith in my alma mater. =(
Btw, Today's Carolinian is a student paper owned by the students, USC admin collects the fund in behalf of the students. USC admin then turn over the funds to TC.
Well, sa among panahon, that was an issue, that the Today's Carolinian was not a real student paper. I guess it's no longer an issue now, which means you should concentrate on sourcing funds. Like I said, earlier, you won't use this as an excuse if you believe you really need it.
Ha? Sure ka Carolinian ka?Originally Posted by radiostar
Originally Posted by radiostar
Yati ra! What exactly happened? Unsa gani `tong CNMS?
Originally Posted by dothe102
instead of pitting one issue against another, instead of blaming the students for the policies of the administration, the problems that the students face inside the university should be seen in the context of how commercialized education has become, and to devise moves to control as much as possible through student pressure.
An assumption here is that commercialization is something that needs to be deterred. And why is that? Its a business establishment doing what it necessarily does in a capitalist society.As long as it operates in its parameters, ethical and legal, then why not. UNless of course somebody throws a revolution and changes the entire setting, perhaps only then could we talk about the evil of commercialization
the attitude of not being able to see the glaring mistake that has caused this situation to arise is the very same attitude that does not see the glaring mistake that has caused the squabbles happening between opposing interests, may it be on the halls of Congress or in the streets.
An assumption here is that there is a mistake committed. not just a mistake, a glaring mistake. But is that mistake then? your position is too general. It doesn't even touch ground to what is being talked about. You claim there is a mistake, a glaring mistake, but what is that mistake? without having to mention it, you relate it to a more general concept: the mistakes between opposing interest. quite vague, care to elaborate a lil further perhaps.
i guess what is happening in USC is a case of the institution giving the students a magnifying glass to spot the errors of the world so that the students can change it, only for the students to see it first in the institution itself. yes i agree! definitely. only that the students are too busy complaining against the administration that they no longer look at themselves and where they stand. Most are too busy with their self-interests they forget that the entire university is a community, an interrelated body, you cant please everyone.
education should never be static in a sense that 'you should only expect what you pay for'. even the self-proclaimed 'liberal institution' that USC sees itself would agree to that. such 'static education' has been faced out long ago in the 80's it's a wonder how many can still stick to it. unfortunately, even the venerable USC cannot claim to practice what they preach. and that is the issue. and what do you mean by static education? is there such a thing? i dont think so.
how about the 'textbook scandal' that the students protested a few years back; an issue that caught the attention of the whole city, is that not important too? or the usual misappropriation of funds directed to spurious projects that could have been better spent on something useful? complaints have been circulating around USC's campuses for years, and curiously the same problems are not limited to USC only. the mid-sem renovation of the library may be dear to you, but to assure you, it's not the only issue there is. if there is a mistake, im not saying that the students should do nothing rather they should make noise, but they should also know where they stand, why they stand. The tendency is that the student interests becomes so ego-centric at times, they forget their limitations, the very virtues they are heralding.
and you blame the students for the hypocrisy of commercialized 'Christian' education? did i blame them? i honestly might have forgotten, ill be much appreciated if you quote me from my earlier posts.
the question, of course, is where one stands. its not just where one stands, because its to whimsical. but also, know if what you stand for is Right, objectiively.
cheers.
ang uban diri ba morag nag-praktis naman pagka politiko..ang mga inistoryahan kay politiko kaau..nyahahaha
pasensya sa mga na-igo ha...opinion lang ni nako..
kay mo tackle silag national issues ma.o nang dile ka ma tawag og school paper?Originally Posted by dubioz
No, no, during my time, it was alleged that there was no "freedom of the press" for the Today's Carolinian. Some students were of the impression that it was a mouthpiece for the administration.
You should also look up the meaning of "organ", if you want to be involved in its revival.Originally Posted by radiostar
Similar Threads |
|