hasty generalizations ey? what we need is a strict enforcement of the law on hazing. If you ban frats, they'll just go underground without needing toOriginally Posted by chad_tukes
hasty generalizations ey? what we need is a strict enforcement of the law on hazing. If you ban frats, they'll just go underground without needing toOriginally Posted by chad_tukes
Why rant it on fraternities when gangs and some other groups are more notorious yet we don't hear much from them? We give bandaid solutions yet at the back of our minds we're sure that deaths caused by hazing will still be there. The way I see it, the abolition of fraternities is just a mere "solution" so the people will see that at least they're doing something. A very hypocrite act.
hypocrisy indeed..they just need a "sacrificail" lamb, that's my takeOriginally Posted by yokam
did i say i agree on the abolitions? i am merely bringing my own logic of things out in the open. you can disagree with me if you want to.Originally Posted by thadzonline
it is quite inappropriate to blame it on the fraternity as a whole, yet acts of violence are caused by individuals belonging to a certain fraternity. this is something that is very debatable. but yes, i agree on the whole notion that abolition of fraternities is difficult or near impossible.Originally Posted by yokam
oh i see, you were supposing the logic from where the proposal was based on..my bad, did not read clearly..peace
OT: not a prob.Originally Posted by thadzonline
With this, I assume that those persons, especially Miriam Santiago knows that too. We don't know what's her real catch here but for sure the abolition of fraternities will no way can solve the hazing problems, and she knows that too. She's probably very mad because of the death of Chris Mendez and it's not only her who feels that way towards the responsible fratmen of Sigma Rho. There's nothing wrong to get mad but if she'll try to give solutions merely by basing on how she feels, then it's not right and rational either.it is quite inappropriate to blame it on the fraternity as a whole, yet acts of violence are caused by individuals belonging to a certain fraternity. this is something that is very debatable. but yes, i agree on the whole notion that abolition of fraternities is difficult or near impossible.
I would AGREE on this MEDIA HYPE and SENSATIONALIZED ISSUE of yours because you are exprfessing it towards the HAZING ISSUE which is not new either . Now that is FRAT RELATED because it is SANCTIONED by the FRAT .Originally Posted by chad_tukes
But then take note also ... for everyones C ONSUMPTION , FRAT SANCTIONED refers to the INITIATION RITE , physical injury is another .
" A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. " - 2nd Amendment , Bill of Rights of the United States of America
they dont give licenses to gangs.. therefore its their obligation to regulate actions within licensed fraternities..Originally Posted by yokam
Naa man to forums sa UP na mo counter ang mga FRATMEN why they should not be ABOLISHED . I am pretty sure tubagon ra pod na nila , unaha na ug ABOLISHED ang mga TRAPO na PUBLIC SERVANTS and POLITICIANS ... but then again that is IMPOSSIBLE and will never happen . Just like the FRATERNITIES . Ma regulate but never ma abolish .
" A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. " - 2nd Amendment , Bill of Rights of the United States of America
Similar Threads |
|