400D rana
sharp laG au.....and the colors are vivid!
i thought u're using the MARK III or MARK II.....
ni gamit ka HDR?
400D rana
sharp laG au.....and the colors are vivid!
i thought u're using the MARK III or MARK II.....
ni gamit ka HDR?
@TwinJet
btw iya mga models amazing au!!! SEXY!!ehehhehe....
swerte au ang photographer!weheheheh
You can't tell how sharp a photo straight from camera if its being presented as a web image so 400D/MK III or MKII doesnt matter for a web image..Originally Posted by blaire123
The sharpness actually depends mostly on the lens you are using and the camera settings. If you shoot with just about the right kind of settings you can get the sharpness that you want, get it wrong and the blurriness maybe caused by camera shake or OOF (out of focus), its not about the camera.Originally Posted by blaire123
For the colors, the camera can help a little. Cameras with High Dynamic Range can usually get details without the highlight blown up. But that also will have to depend on the right camera settings. For the colors, I usually shoot RAW on a 400D, this will leave me with the best option to tweak the colors/white balance later in Lightroom during post processing.
wow! 135 2.0! nice one kolzOriginally Posted by kolz
@ Ian.....
yeah i know...pero mag depende mn pud na sa size sa image nga g post sa web....
naa uban dagko size mao ma klaro jud ang pixels...ma ilhan mn jud nimo nga sharp iya image though d jud hinuon ka mka tell if it's 400D/MARK II or III....
because Im sure kolz' photos were sharpened using USM or whatever method for web viewing.. not necessarily because of just the Xti/MK III.. II.. kolz mentioned that a big part of having a sharp and properly focused image is the setting, lens.. which is true..
kaon sa...
Steamed Pork Spare Ribs
whew! gutom...
Similar Threads |
|