Originally Posted by
yokam
I once gave an analogy about car accidents: There's a lot of car accidents, then if we apply the same solution as we've been applying now, then it's saying that we should ban all cars.
With their aim to stop hazing and further deaths that results from hazing, abolition of fraternities and sororities is just a desperate move to put an end to such crimes. With or without fraternities, such delinquents will still exist and the only thing that they could change is that there will no longer be any fraternity-related crimes because of the very fact that fraternities no longer exist in anybody's context. With the abolition of fraternities, is there a guarantee that deaths resulting from hazing will stop? Frat wars will just turn into gang wars and it's just a mere change of name.
And other thing, such a move is throwing away a whole basket of tomatoes because of just a very few rotten ones. Very impractical.
lahi ang analogy sa cars kay dili man sanctioned sa car companies nga magkacar accident, but ang hazing gisanction man sa frat, so there is a clear line there.. my point is kung dili i-ban then let then straighten up, crack down on those who violate the law, make sure nga frats will no longer do hazing, which is of course hard to do considering the resistance..qualified man sad ang akoang argument nga i-ban lang
ONLY if they break the law, wala man ko niingon nga outright i-ban tanan