What is your opinion on Same S3x marriages?

[Jhared]

---

It seems that with the passing of the RH bill into law, as evident by Supreme Court's recent decision, next to come up soon will be the legalization of Same-s3x marriages.

Next on the near horizon are Divorce and Legal Abortion. But those two fit a separate thread by themselves.

What do you say?

Update: .. talked to someone connected with Congress last Sunday, while watching Pacman-Bradley .. those three topics are being talked about in conversations up there.

It wont happen, at least in the foreseeable future., because there is already a law that renders same-*** marriages invalid..

but when two people of the same *** decides to love one another and live with each other, who are we to judge right?

[SioDenz]

but when two people of the same *** decides to love one another and live with each other, who are we to judge right?

Rejecting the Act of same *** marriage because of Ones Belief is Is NOT the same as Judging the People who wants to have Same *** Marriage. And Love is Not the Reason why People Dont agree with Same *** Marriage. And People dont Agree with Same *** Marriage Not because they Hate Gays or Judge Gays as Sinners. Its the ACT not the Actors. I think your Confuse as HELL

Preaching again about individualism as reason but wants to be accepted by All. What a Joke...

[Jhared]

Rejecting the Act of same *** marriage because of Ones Belief is Is NOT the same as Judging the People who wants to have Same *** Marriage. And Love is Not the Reason why People Dont agree with Same *** Marriage. And People dont Agree with Same *** Marriage Not because they Hate Gays or Judge Gays as Sinners. Its the ACT not the Actors. I think your Confuse as HELL

Preaching again about individualism as reason but wants to be accepted by All. What a Joke...

Hahaha whatever man.. i think YOU are the one whose confused as HELL here,.. saying that rejection is not the same as judgement, pfft! what a silly predicament.. ain't rejection a product of judgement? think about it.... any willful act is congruent to the person doing it.. therefore judging an act is judging the actor altogether..

please read before you berate,. it think kuwang imong pagsabot densio, living with each other does not mean only marriage... haha.. i didnt say that i approve same *** marriage, because for one it is not a valid form of marriage, and second given our social state it is not normal.. but when two people decide to love each other and live with one another whether or not they are of the same gender, it is something that our country respects, therefore we have to respect that freedom., well as long as they are not interfering with your rights., im just saying who are we to judge their act?

[brendomar]

Our law is moral.. therefore in line with god and his teachings

yes true, and this Antichrist system is trying to destroy it. That's why gay marriage and other abominable things are being twisted as morally good.

[euan]

happy man cla. go!

[johnlloyd23]

dili man ni desente ang same *** marriage bros uy.

[Jhared]

yes true, and this Antichrist system is trying to destroy it. That's why gay marriage and other abominable things are being twisted as morally good.

wat system? it is still not a norm in our country, so chill out.. what other abominable things im curious..

[SioDenz]

Hahaha whatever man.. i think YOU are the one whose confused as HELL here,.. saying that rejection is not the same as judgement, pfft! what a silly predicament.. ain't rejection a product of judgement? think about it.... any willful act is congruent to the person doing it.. therefore judging an act is judging the actor altogether..

please read before you berate,. it think kuwang imong pagsabot densio, living with each other does not mean only marriage... haha.. i didnt say that i approve same *** marriage, because for one it is not a valid form of marriage, and second given our social state it is not normal.. but when two people decide to love each other and live with one another whether or not they are of the same gender, it is something that our country respects, therefore we have to respect that freedom., well as long as they are not interfering with your rights., im just saying who are we to judge their act?

Your last Post is this:

"but when two people of the same *** decides to love one another and live with each other, who are we to judge right?"

You obviously was talking about the PEOPLE, its in a PERSON level. So when you say Who are We to Judge, its referring to the TWO People.
Did we reject same *** marriage because we Judge those 2 People? NOPE...
We reject the IDEA, the ACT, the CONCEPT, because it VIOLATES our Own Belief - NOT because we Judge those People

Judging the ACT is Judging the Actor? LOL nimu...
-So if the story of a Movie sucks, it automatically mean that the actors also sucks?

[Jhared]

Your last Post is this:

"but when two people of the same *** decides to love one another and live with each other, who are we to judge right?"

You obviously was talking about the PEOPLE, its in a PERSON level. So when you say Who are We to Judge, its referring to the TWO People.
Did we reject same *** marriage because we Judge those 2 People? NOPE...
We reject the IDEA, the ACT, the CONCEPT, because it VIOLATES our Own Belief - NOT because we Judge those People

Judging the ACT is Judging the Actor? LOL nimu...
-So if the story of a Movie sucks, it automatically mean that the actors also sucks?

i was talking about homosexual relationships in general and the homosexuals themselves, if they decide to form a relationship we should not judge them and their relationship, so ya, its pretty much a two-birds-in-one-stone statement.. and it's different coz i was not referring to same *** marriage when i said it., its you who's trying to hide on your own homophobic propaganda.. you know what they say about homophobics hahaha..

you didnt get the metaphor, and your metaphor is silly,.
we should both know that we are not referring to an actor as in an "actor" that is pretending to act, but a person who does a certain intentional act, like a criminal who killed someone, you dont only just judge the killing, you also judge the person that did the killing, that is why we are throwing criminals in prison, because we are judging them altogether along with their evil acts.. get it?... so when you say that you, Densio, is against the ACT of same *** marriage, it is in your judgement that it is wrong, that it is sinful, that it is evil, correct? therefore it will also be in your judgement that the people that will do such ACT, or wanted to do the ACT, are evil for conceiving that idea in their heads.. so dont confuse us by separating the ACT to its doer,

its like saying you hate robbing but you dont hate robbers.. hahaha, dont make me laugh, not that you already did..

[SioDenz]

i was talking about homosexual relationships in general and the homosexuals themselves, if they decide to form a relationship we should not judge them and their relationship, so ya, its pretty much a two-birds-in-one-stone statement.. and it's different coz i was not referring to same *** marriage when i said it., its you who's trying to hide on your own homophobic propaganda.. you know what they say about homophobics hahaha..

you didnt get the metaphor, and your metaphor is silly,.

Your original post that i commented is this:

It wont happen, at least in the foreseeable future., because there is already a law that renders same-*** marriages invalid..

but when two people of the same *** decides to love one another and live with each other, who are we to judge right?

Your talking about the LAW in one sentence and talk about Judging People in personal Level on the next?
I think You are Really Confuse or No Clue on what Really is The reason Why Majority of People Don't agree with Same *** marriage.

And now your actually talking about Metaphors? its not Metaphor - Its CONFUSION

The Problem with you is you assume too much. If i say I dont agree with same *** because it violates my Own Belief. And the Idea that you want to Force the Majority to Abandon their Belief just because of Feelligs is Not OK. Does that automatically Mean I Judge Gays? or hate gays?

we should both know that we are not referring to an actor as in an "actor" that is pretending to act, but a person who does a certain intentional act, like a criminal who killed someone, you dont only just judge the killing, you also judge the person that did the killing, that is why we are throwing criminals in prison, because we are judging them altogether along with their evil acts.. get it?... so when you say that you, Densio, is against the ACT of same *** marriage, it is in your judgement that it is wrong, that it is sinful, that it is evil, correct? therefore it will also be in your judgement that the people that will do such ACT, or wanted to do the ACT, are evil for conceiving that idea in their heads.. so dont confuse us by separating the ACT to its doer,

its like saying you hate robbing but you dont hate robbers.. hahaha, dont make me laugh, not that you already did..

Dont Shove your Atheistic Mentality to us because we Dont think that WAY

Theistic belief (especially Christian Faith) if you are paying any Attention - are laid on several Core Teaching which includes "DONT Judge Others so that you will Not be Judge". Now There is No Sense if a THEIST disagree with Same *** marriage because of his Theistic Belief but at the same time Judge or Hate gays - because it violates His belief in the First Place.

So Theist Disagree with the ACT of Same *** Marriage, Not Because They Judge People or Hate Gays But Because it violate their Belief.

You see, as what i have said, Your are Clueless on the reason why Theist Disagree with Same *** Marriage - Because You assume that since you Think That way, other people are also have the same Mentality as You - which is a Big FAIL

And Lastly, we are Talking about a LAW that is GOING to be IMPLEMENTED in the Future, if we are Going to Agree or Not Agree. So when i say I dont Agree with Same *** marriage to be Legalize, but i dont Hate gays - is not Laughable Because same *** marriage is an ACT that is Planning to DO and is Separate LEVEL to the People that will eventually exercise it.

and then you say:
"its like saying you hate robbing but you dont hate robbers."

Your example is about HATE When did we say WE HATE Same *** Marriage.. ? LOL
Is this really the WAY you Understand Things?