Mga boss, mangayo ta ko sa inyong mga bulawanong tambag
![Cheesy](images/smilies/cheesy.gif)
![Cheesy](images/smilies/cheesy.gif)
![Cheesy](images/smilies/cheesy.gif)
![Cheesy](images/smilies/cheesy.gif)
Asa'y mas maayo aning duha? Basically, pare-pareho raman ni sila ug specs, ang galahi lang kay:
- processor (which personally, I don't mind kay either MediaTek or Qualcomm kay ok ra nako)
- battery life (kinda mu matter jud kay 2100mAh ra ang OmegaHD2.0 while 3000mAh ang Titan2.0)
- USB OTG (wala sa OmegaHD2.0, naa sa Titan2.0
- Scratch-proof screen (Dragontail ang sa OmegaHD2.0, walay naka specify sa Titan2.0)
Omega HD 2.0 Full Specs:
Cherry Mobile Omega HD 2.0: 5-inch HD IPS Dragontrail Glass Display, Quad-core processor, 1GB RAM, and Android 4.2 Jelly Bean | NoypiGeeks | Philippines' Technology News, Reviews, and How to's
Titan 2.0 Full Specs:
Cherry Mobile Titan 2.0 Price, Specs : Quad Core Smartphone with 3,000 mAh Battery, Charges Other Gadgets Like a Powerbank | TechPinas : Philippines' Technology News, Tips and Reviews Blog
Though kinda inclined ko sa Titan2.0, medyo di kaayo ko confident kay wa paman gud kaayo'y review ani niya. While sa OmegaHD2.0 kay dugay2 naman, medyo daghan2 najud ug review nga ok siya, and daghan nang tweaks/upgrades nga available sa market.
So please advise mga bossing. Salamat kadaghan.
![Loyal](images/smilies/loyal.png)