S*x: A Necessity or a "must" for relationships?

[necrotic freak]

---

u can have *** without love....

can u love without ***? ikaw na mag igo ana unsa-on na nmo....

Love without ***? YES it can be.. love ba nimo imong mga ginikanan? so meaning nakig *** sad ka sa imong mama ug papa?

[SPRINGFIELD_XD_40]

I agree that here in our country most of our fellowmen tend to be "conservative", and people in the US tend to be more "liberal". But if "morality" depends on where you live (in the US or here in RP), it wouldn't be objective anymore.

It is SUBJECTIVE kay naa man gihapon FILIPINOS who are now " WESTERNERS " kuno and maybe some Asians and some fellow Caucasians in general . But , remmeber that there are also LIBERAL FIlipinos in the Philippines na wala nakatamak ug US soil .

Pareha ra man bro. I mean, for Catholics in the US and here in the country for example, pareha ra man ilang pagtuo with regards to what's moral. Pero as you may know naa puy mga groups claiming to be "Catholics" nga misukwahi pud sa Church, like for example those who are for the ordination of women, etc. The Church have their reason for refusing to acknowledge that.

Not true , outside of being LIBERAL and issues regarding *** , Christians if not Catholics here in the US are not Hypocrites which is offtopic anyways .

Yes, I believe in the rightness of Catholic morals (particularly with regards to ***); I wouldn't be making this stand on this issue if I didn't really believe them. And it's not wrong just because I believe it's wrong. It's wrong regardless of my saying so.

See , it is not being OBJECTIVE but SUBJECTIVE . I am also Catholic , but doesnt believed in all the teachings of the church that was claiming it as RIGHT and everything else outside it are WRONG .

If you marry in front of the altar, you are married in the eyes of God.

No relevance at all , we are talking about *** as a must in a RELATIONSHIP . Being in a relationship doesnt mean na kaslon gyud mo sa atubangan sa altar kay di gani magbuwag mo hala !

Pero you agree nga PMS is okay?

Unsa lage na ang PMS ?

I'm simply saying all of us Christians face these moral questions daily, and we have to decide if certain things are right or wrong. With PMS, we have to decide if it's right or wrong. We can't be neutral, because our religion is not neutral on that issue.

I follow the 10 commandments , bible preachings and believed in the GOD as a Catholic , NOT what the church says all the time concerning *** .

[andch81]

as long as its not *** that u love in the realtionship.. its ok.. i guess

[vaughn]

A relationship is not all about ***..........it's not a necessity nor a must. For me, it will become a must when marriend namo. But bf & gf relationship....both should agree in doing such act.

[josephdc]

It is SUBJECTIVE kay naa man gihapon FILIPINOS who are now " WESTERNERS " kuno and maybe some Asians and some fellow Caucasians in general . But , remmeber that there are also LIBERAL FIlipinos in the Philippines na wala nakatamak ug US soil .

You're saying that right and wrong depends on the individual, right? That it's all up to the person to define what's right and what's wrong for him?

Not true , outside of being LIBERAL and issues regarding *** , Christians if not Catholics here in the US are not Hypocrites which is offtopic anyways .

It's true, I guess, that there are many people in the US who are Christians yet practice pre-marital ***. But it doesn't make PMS right.

See , it is not being OBJECTIVE but SUBJECTIVE .

What I meant when I said "it's not wrong just because I believe it's wrong; it's wrong regardless of my saying so," is that there is such a thing as an objective moral law that exists.

I am also Catholic , but doesnt believed in all the teachings of the church that was claiming it as RIGHT and everything else outside it are WRONG .

Unsa'y reason bro ngano dili ka mutuo sa uban teachings?

No relevance at all , we are talking about *** as a must in a RELATIONSHIP . Being in a relationship doesnt mean na kaslon gyud mo sa atubangan sa altar kay di gani magbuwag mo hala !

You asked me what if civil marriage lang di ba?

Dili jud maayo if sa huwes lang mo magpakasal kay in the eyes of God you're not married. If serious jud inyong relationship, it requires both your commitment at the altar. Mao pud siguro na'y reason nganong naay uban civil marriage lang, it's convenient. Dali ra talikdan ang commitment.

Unsa lage na ang PMS ?

Pre-marital ***.

I follow the 10 commandments , bible preachings and believed in the GOD as a Catholic , NOT what the church says all the time concerning *** .

The church's teaching on *** is really beautiful and true. Try to read about the theology of the body.

What is Theology of the Body?

Pope John Paul II devoted the first major teaching project of his pontificate – 129 short talks between September of 1979 and November of 1984 – to providing a profoundly beautiful vision of human embodiment and erotic love. He gave this project the working title “theology of the body.”

George Weigel, author of Witness to Hope: The Biography of Pope John Paul II, calls this papal study of human sexuality “one of the boldest reconfigurations of Catholic theology in centuries” – a “theological time-bomb set to go off with dramatic consequences ...perhaps in the twenty-first century.” At this point the Pope’s vision of sexual love “has barely begun to shape the Church’s theology, preaching, and religious education.” But when it does, Weigel predicts, “it will compel a dramatic development of thinking about virtually every major theme in the Creed” (pp. 336, 343, 853).

Far from being a footnote in the Christian life, the way we understand the body and the sexual relationship “concerns the entire Bible” (Jan 13, 82). It plunges us into “the perspective of the whole Gospel, of the whole teaching, in fact, of the whole mission of Christ” (Dec 3, 80). Christ’s mission, according to the spousal analogy of the Scriptures, is to “marry” us. He invites us to live with him in an eternal life-giving union of love.

This is what the union of the sexes is meant to proclaim and foreshadow – the eternal union of Christ and the Church. As St. Paul says, quoting from Genesis, “‘For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh.’ This is a great mystery, and I mean in reference to Christ and the church” (Eph 5:31-32).

By helping us understand this profound interconnection between *** and the Christian mystery, John Paul’s theology of the body not only paves the way for lasting renewal of marriage and the family; it enables everyone to rediscover “the meaning of the whole of existence, the meaning of life” (Oct 29, 80).

• What is the theology of the body and why is it changing so many lives? (http://christopherwest.com/article1.asp)
• Theology of the Body: A Compelling, Bold, Biblical Response to the Sexual Revolution (http://christopherwest.com/article12.asp)
• A basic theology of marriage (http://christopherwest.com/article2.asp)

Christopher West's website: http://www.christopherwest.com/

[Pinkdimensions]

basta ako.. sabot2x nalang..if mosugot sya much better if deli?? awwww.. eseduce or etease ihihih..

[khent08]

basta ako.. sabot2x nalang..if mosugot sya much better if deli?? awwww.. eseduce or etease ihihih..

hala! e-seduce ko beh.. wahahaha!

[Pinkdimensions]

way unay! bwhahahah a

[khent08]

way unay! bwhahahah a

waaaaaa! laki diay ka? kuyaw man gud kay ka og screen name..

[Pinkdimensions]

sakpan ka lagi! hahaha