OT: Gipaluyohan raba nila si Nancy Binay last election... unsa kaha ilang nakita ngano ila gi.endorse? Or naa lain rason ngano? unsa sad kaha?
OT: Gipaluyohan raba nila si Nancy Binay last election... unsa kaha ilang nakita ngano ila gi.endorse? Or naa lain rason ngano? unsa sad kaha?
Who are they to deserve such special treatment? Our heroes of today, the OFWS deserve much more than them. The politicians proposing this are the "sipsip" kind with selfish interest in aid of election or reelection. Shame on them!
Easy check? asa gud tawn dha sa article ang easy check
Dili ra INC mahayahay, Apil ang Non INC kay di mahasol di sama sa ubang religious activities...
Wrong analogy, If ika 1000 ka kung naay INC lane. Ikapila man ka if WALAY INC lane? ika 100?
If wala or naay INC lane, Ika 1000 gihapon ka (Or mas duol ka if naay INC lane) kay ang Article WALA nag ingun nga KUHAAN ang Normal Lane para Himuong INC lane. Ang naa sa Article Mag Create ug NEW, Dili mag transfer...
Ingun ka sa previous Post DAPAT patas ra tanan Walay Special? OK ra lagi nimu special sila...
So OK ra nimu nang refuges nga dili patas, OK ra nimu if Special Sila, Pero if INC nga lain religion dili OK...
Ayaw ko apila sa ASSUME nimu kay igo rako nibasa sa Article. Ang TAGA Airport ug Gobyerno ang Nag assume nga daghan muabot mao mangandam sila.
Ikaw ray nag ASSUME nga Sayop sila, so ikaw ug ang Gobyerno ug airport ang nag Assume
Mao nman nay Ginabuhat sa Ubang Religion sa Pinas HAGBAY ra... Kana diay mangampanya nga DILI PABOTARAN ang politiko ni supak sa ilang Stand... its nothing new... its just so happen nga ang Kontra nga Religion nakapabor mao daghan supak...
I can't find the H.R. on the web. What I don't understand is ngano mag himo pa man ug resolution for a once in a 100 year event? Ngano sa house of representatives pa man and why not the airport management? Every 100 years ra man kaha ni, so dapat sa airport management ni dapit, dili sa house of representatives.
They must have forgotten this from the Constitution.
Article 2 Section 6 of the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines clearly states that The separation of Church & State shall be INVIOLABLE.
Article 3 Section 5 of the 1987 Constitution of the Phillippines clearly states that No law shall be made respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. The free exercise and enjoyment of religious profession and worship, without discrimination or preference, shall forever be allowed. No religious test shall be required for the exercise of political rights.
- - - Updated - - -
murag discrimination ra kaayo ang dating sa CR/Restroom sa 3rd s3x. XD
I Agree, its a valid question why himu pa resolution....
- - - Updated - - -
So if ang mga dalan sa Cebu city i Close para sa Procession nga makahasol sa Ubang Non RC, - Naay Law gibuhat ana? Naay resolution ana.
If naa, so Nilapas sad diay nas Constitution?
If Wala, So meaning Illegal nah?
if its only during their centennial celebration, why not? it's a win-win in my case because they built a landmark, the biggest dome stadium which can be used by anyone, regardless of religion or group(parang Araneta colisuem etc)
Similar Threads |
|