guys i just need your expertise.. what lense(nikon) should i buy for outdoors at a budget for 20-30k?

[rednagger]

---

bitaw sakto pud.. mostly akong ggamit karon ky ang 35mm.. akong gpractisan wer to find good angle, tapos ako nag adjust sa akong range

- - - Updated - - -

18-200mm bro dili na ka mag ilis2x lens

70-300 vr ganahan sad ko, dili kaau mahal, dili bug at, image quality ganahan ra sad ko (basta sakto lang kahayagon). Mao ni gamit nako para portrait2x

pwede ei dispose nko akong 18-105 tapos upgrade to 18-200 or ill just stick to 18-105 for awhile?

[Crinkles11]

bitaw sakto pud.. mostly akong ggamit karon ky ang 35mm.. akong gpractisan wer to find good angle, tapos ako nag adjust sa akong range

- - - Updated - - -



pwede ei dispose nko akong 18-105 tapos upgrade to 18-200 or ill just stick to 18-105 for awhile?

testingi lang sa ang 18-200 sa tindahan b3fore ka mopalit basin dili kaayo nimo ma feel ang deprensya.

Para nako keep nako ang 18-105 then sunod palit ko ug prime lens, 35mm, 50mm or 85mm. (akong pilion 85mm kay makasulirap ang bokeh sa kalami) hilig man gud ko portrait2x.

[sleepyantz]

sir crinkles... i had 70-300 in mind at first... but then after lots of thinking and head ache... i went with 80-200 2.8 afd (2 ring version) second hand @30k.ish. loved it never regret my decision even medyo mahal2. 70-300 is good in well lit na scene/environment. but you'll get the cons in lowlight. mas taas pud resale value ang 80-200 if ever ma pulan ka... and its a 2.8 lens. trade off is ang weight pero anad anad ra jud na. solved kaau ko sa d7k with 80-200 combo.. even wla vr though kurog jud ko kamot most of the time anad2 ra pud maka manage raka. correct me if im wrong, d7k pud imo body diba?. ako ra na opinion hihi based on experience. by the way another reason why 80-200 is that, i want to shoot concerns of some sort also so the 2.8 will be a good choice.

[rednagger]

mao pud akong na bantayan 70-300... dli nindot sa lowlight mostly sa review, way off sa budget pud ko sa telephoto lens

[Crinkles11]

Sir @sleepyantz, yes agree ko nimo sir mas nindot ng 80-200 2.8 kaysa 70-300mm vr. Sa tinuod lang mao gyud ta ni akong ganahan pero taas ra para sa akong budget, unya panglingaw2x ra man sad ako, so ok ra.

[sleepyantz]

sir @Crinkles11, na swertehan ra pud to ako 80-200 kay migo nag baligya, gipa 3 gives ra. i saw sa buy and sell na 30k. pero 70-300 is very good jud nahan jud ko niya specialy sa iyang range ug vr. pwde pud nimo to check katong tamron 70-300 gwapo pud ug reviews.

[Crinkles11]

Sir @sleepyantz, naa na man koy 70-300vr hapit na mag 1 yr. ug contented kaayo ko,

Kasagaran manuroy mi adlawan man sad so okay ra gyud kaayo ang 70-300 (outdoor).


@TS, nakapalit na ka?

[sleepyantz]

Aguy wa ko gabasa abi nako si sir @Crinkles11 ang ts sowwiii poooo

awa lang na ako message sa babaw sir ts para imo na bwahahah

naa diay ko lain input.. para nako rani huh... i'd stay away from 18-200 it will make you a lazy photographer. 35mm/50mm will help you master composition barato pa jud sharp pa jud. then the tele for hard to reach na mga shots.

[Crinkles11]

nagkuyog mi sa ako boss palit iyang d4, ang iyang gipares 28-300 kay kapoy daw ilis2x ug lens.hehe.

[sleepyantz]

wahaha nindota anang d4 oi! wahah mao sad kapoy jud ilis lens nya maabogan pa jud imo sensor... pero personal preference ra jud na jud
ang importante it takes pictures.! yeah!