PC Games settings.. am I missing something?? GPU Bottleneck??

[keropi]

---

Why do Game Devs put these settings on games knowing that it requires unecessary power to run them. It makes no sense..

It delineates the hardcore gamers from the mainstream gamers, the "because-i-game" crowd from the "because-i-can" crowd, the jordan 28 buyers from the jordan 1 retro buyers, mediocrity from perfection..

And most of all, it's a business. Game devs are getting support from nvidia and amd to make their games better looking but more demanding.

[LadYKilleR8520]

More like Can it run Crysis crowd.. looks more like Uber E-peen to me.. hahaha..

[keropi]

More like Can it run Crysis crowd.. looks more like Uber E-peen to me.. hahaha..

Crysis 1 (and even succeeding releases) was a reasonable basis to measure video cards because with every 1-upped setting, naay nindot na effect on visual quality. Metro series is a poor comparison to Crysis and is more of a failed attempt to match Crysis' cult status.

To be able to run Crysis 3, Farcry 3, Battlefield 4 in max is not about E-peen but more of the visuals.

Metro 2033, LL @ max and Witcher3 with ubersampling are what makes least sense. Even Saints Row 4 and Shogun 2 IMO is unreasonably resource intensive.

IMO, with the quality of current games, a better measure of a video card's capability is the dated/old but not outclassed Just Cause 2 of 2010. If your card can run max settings with that game @ 1080p, no doubt you have a good card.

[LadYKilleR8520]

yup.. really liked testing graphics on Crysis 1.. crysis 2 however, wala nah kaau na.empasize ang environment..

[keropi]

yup.. really liked testing graphics on Crysis 1.. crysis 2 however, wala nah kaau na.empasize ang environment..

I dont think it is that far bro. Gameplay and storyline siguro, but as far as visuals are concerned Crysis 2 is still a big improvement in quality. I still had Crysis 1 installed in the other pc just to test if lower-end current cards can still handle that game. I cant remember how much amazed i was at the graphic quality back then, but now, comparing it to 2 and 3, murag MineCraft na lang tan-aw ko niya.

[LadYKilleR8520]

Im talking about folliage boss.. the setting on Crysis 1 was more "challenging" than on 2 and 3.. imagine Crysis 1 remade to be handled by newer tech.. Imba tingale kaau tan.awn..

[senpai91]

yup.. really liked testing graphics on Crysis 1.. crysis 2 however, wala nah kaau na.empasize ang environment..

During its glory yes it was. If you have a new pc back then people would ask "Yeah, but can it run Crysis?" it became a trend. Out of the three I like Crysis 1's setting, I just love that jungle setting.

But in terms of graphics quality 2 was better. Crysis 3? is just amazing and stunning low/medium/high/very high they almost look the same well almost. Kung sa 1 pa nga mga settings ang low mura jud sticker gi palit ahaha.

Story-wise, Crysis 1 was epic!!!!!!

[LordZhen]

very true on this line "murag sticker gi pilit" makahinumdom ko ani sa una..when i had my first computer, it was a pentium 4 (high school ko ato) mga year 2001, lipay na kaayo duwa quake 3 ug starcraft hehe and moduwa pa gali to ug wow, pero low lang settings, ang importante sa una bahala low basta ka duwa, karon raman on the process na nindot ug graphics..well im just speaking for myself hehe

[m.garz]

mura ra nag sakyanan bro, bisag unsaon ug upgrade sa makina dili gihapon taga adlaw maka bulhot.. hehe..

[sniper007]

mga master ask lang ko unsay mas nindot high fps or low fps? unsay effect ana sa imong giduwaan?