depende sa pag tan-aw ani. kay kung kamu naa sa sitwasyon na live-in,
naay time na mka ingon mo na happy mo. pero ANTI jud ko
depende sa pag tan-aw ani. kay kung kamu naa sa sitwasyon na live-in,
naay time na mka ingon mo na happy mo. pero ANTI jud ko
ANTI ko pro ok r pd ang live in daan b4 menyo pra m.sure gyd s gibati. haha
Whichever works for the couple. i am for the couple's best interest.
Pro Marriage, aie. Wa man sa choices. Hahahaha
Pge
Ill say have a sleepover on weekends first and take it from there.
Pro ko. Mas makaila ka sa tao/partner if naa cya sa balay.
I used to be pro-live-in but I realized, I still want to walk down the aisle
while my lifetime partner will wait for me at the altar to start our journey
together to a wedded bliss
"People who love to eat are always the BEST people."
Julia Child
sauna anti, pero pro na karon. advised sako sisters and mom kay my sisters lived a happy married life after 1-2 years of live in kay they knew their hubbies and learned to accept them flaws... My mom never been to live in before marriage so it took her a veeery long time (and a dfficult one) to adjust and now bulag na ako parents but they live under the same roof... confusing but less stressful. I have logical parents (I think).
One more thing na agree ko ani is because I dont want everything to change na kalit kalit....
I like gradual change pud... from how he is in the morning, how to deal with the family and somehow his pets (ganiang buntag na-amaw kos ka stress) became a training ground for raising the most difficult kids... Mayra maanad ko.
Im not good with unpleasant surprises. so Gradual change ako nahan
Last edited by quirkychinita; 12-16-2013 at 10:53 PM.
for me either way, it cud be useful..
however my heart say for pro live in but my mind says anti live in. lols.
kung palame ra ang giapas daghan gyud ng pro kay dli na cla mobayad para maka palame.
Similar Threads |
|