Arnold Clavio’s interview with Napoles Lawyer Atty. Villamor received negative reactions

[jeremiahjay]

---

on the contrary, ang abogado deadly ni

kamao sa tactics, kamao magpalagot

sud sa taro si arn2x gud

front seat! hahahaha

Nagpakahero abig contra kaayo si napoles sa tawo, insakto na iya style...Kana iya show di ko ganahan mutan aw ana... murag bugalbugalon na di ko kasabot.

[redemption32]

Ug usa sad ngano mag tell man jud tag mga bad words ug naa tay ipaabot nga mensahe? Let's be civil diri mga mature man kaha ta. No need anang mga bogoa, buang, amaw uban pa. LOL

In short relaxxxx...

Mao bitaw bisan unsa ka tempting, wa tika tawga ug bogo. Mao bitaw "bogo-ag example oi" akng gisulti!!

[Nefarian]

Ok. Sige nah kay you're sticking to that excuse man, dawaton nato. Ok. Example RA to.. Sige, maayo nah nah imung example..

Pero kay abi naa mn kay example nga ang nahitabo diri, nahitabo sad sa lain nga nasod, sakto na d.i nah? O, ayaw gamita nga lusot ha nga mao ray gipangutana ni mang kulas. Ako nay nangutana. Sakto d.i gihapon iyang gibuhat?

"Ug unsa ray gipangayo mao ray ihatag."

Huwaton tana imung ihatag brader beh..

LOL ok.

Kining perception bahin sa right or wrong brad is depende kung asa na TAWO gi point nimo imong question. Ug ako pangutan'on bahin aning Clavio wala koy nakitang problema so mahulog nga gi condone nako siya. Pero sa uban pareha nimo galagot niya.

Kay abi against ang usa ka tawo sa opinion sa MAJORITY sayop na diay siya? Unsa may basis ninyo nga sakto na sakto ni? Kay abi daghan mo? Pero ug ma priso si Clavio ana iyang gibuhat kana guro naa namoy basihan nga sakto mo. Ang point ani brad walay sakto or dili sakto kay lahi2x tag pang huna2x or opinion in short. LOL.

Wala koy nakitang problema sa gibuhat ni Clavio wether you like it or not. hehe

[shayneyap]

HOY! Akoa ning thread way mag away!
Haha bitaw, peace lang ta tanan diri.

[Nefarian]

HOY! Akoa ning thread way mag away!
Haha bitaw, peace lang ta tanan diri.

LOL sorry miss. Let's be constructive here lang gud. Ug dili ma swak ang opinion sa usa ka tawo sa inyong opinion ayaw ninyo awaya hehe.

[redemption32]

LOL ok.

Kining perception bahin sa right or wrong brad is depende kung asa na TAWO gi point nimo imong question. Ug ako pangutan'on bahin aning Clavio wala koy nakitang problema so mahulog nga gi condone nako siya. Pero sa uban pareha nimo galagot niya.

Kay abi against ang usa ka tawo sa opinion sa MAJORITY sayop na diay siya? Unsa may basis ninyo nga sakto na sakto ni? Kay abi daghan mo? LOL.

In short brad, wala koy nakitang problema sa gibuhat ni Clavio wether you like it or not. hehe

Actually, wa ko naglagot ni Arnold Clavio. I just find his interview unprofessional and unbecoming. If you had really listened to the interview, Atty Villamor was very clear. He was not Janet's lawyer on the Pork Barrel Scam. He was only the lawyer for the serious illegal detention. That point was made clear early on. But Arnold kept questioning him things that he said he was not in the position to answer. Nya si Arnold Clavio pa ang masuko? Sakto d.i nah?

Wa ko nisulti nga sakto ko and sayop ka (although that's what I think). I'm telling you I don't agree with your line of reasoning.

Di d.i ka ganahan questionon imung arguments?

Ganahan kag taga post nimu sa istorya, mag sige lang ug like ug "I agree" ang mga tao?

Discussion ni bai, defend your argument. Don't cry foul when we disagree. Mura sad kag bata dah.

[jeremiahjay]

Kung si Jinggoy to kaistorya ni Arnold ambot lang maka ato ba siya...to think mao man gyuy giconsider nga sangkot sa kaso..

[Nefarian]

Actually, wa ko naglagot ni Arnold Clavio. I just find his interview unprofessional and unbecoming. If you had really listened to the interview, Atty Villamor was very clear. He was not Janet's lawyer on the Pork Barrel Scam. He was only the lawyer for the serious illegal detention. That point was made clear early on. But Arnold kept questioning him things that he said he was not in the position to answer. Nya si Arnold Clavio pa ang masuko? Sakto d.i nah?

Wa ko nisulti nga sakto ko and sayop ka (although that's what I think). I'm telling you I don't agree with your line of reasoning.

Di d.i ka ganahan questionon imung arguments?

Ganahan kag taga post nimu sa istorya, mag sige lang ug like ug "I agree" ang mga tao?

Discussion ni bai, defend your argument. Don't cry foul when we disagree. Mura sad kag bata dah.

Hahaha asa ko ni cry ug foul? Nga i made it clear raman nga naa ko sa side ni Clavio ug maglagot ko sa mga tawo nga mo defend ni Napoles. Ug usa sad nihatag rako ug sample bahin aning barbaric acts lol.

Kanang before nako i post ako reply brad ako sana basahon balik nga dili ko maka provoke ug tawo like NOT naming names or questioning his intelligence.

Back to topic: Clavio! Clavio!

[judge3ni]

mao na..balik na pud..whatever suits you..

[redemption32]

Look, Bai Nefarian, I know where you stand. You're against corruption. I am too. And so are the rest of the posters here.
And I think you're smart, I really do. But you shouldn't drop your logic and let emotions rule.

We hate Napoles.
But it's unfair to hate the people that are working for her now.
Mind you, they are not working with Napoles on the scam.
They're just providing her representation on the courts.
A right that you and I have.
If it's not Atty Villamor, it's someone else.
Someone else has to do that job.

You say that it's a choice to accept the case or not.
What if every lawyer takes the moral high ground and declines the case?
What would you want to happen?
Have Napoles defend herself?
Or should we just throw her in Jail without a trial?

- - - Updated - - -

Kanang before nako i post ako reply brad ako sana basahon balik nga dili ko maka provoke ug tawo like NOT naming names or questioning his intelligence.

By what kind of insane logic do you nurture in between your ears?

In-ani imong pasabot nga imong basahon balik para di ka maka provoke ug tao like questioning his/her intelligence?

Well, I think you dropped the ball on this one.