Kinsa jud imo gituohan kung diin jud tah gikan, ang Bible or Science?

[balbacuast]

---

walay nakahibaw jud. pareho rana sa kung kinsay nag una ang itlog ba o manok

actually both in the bible and science can answer this. and ang manok jd ang nag.una.

[SioDenz]

The Bible said that the first man was Adam, how did you know he was Adam? Geez.

Who the hell said that I know the first man is?
Its written in the Bible, so its already there, and since we believed the Bible is Inspired by God then its Adam

And along the bible, it doesn't also say Adam was a caveman. Science have proven that it takes a male and female intersection to create a human life. You cannot just simply appear in human form from a tree or wherever Adam came from.

peace.

The Bible is Not a Scientific Book.... You expect God to discuss DNA in Genesis and let Primitive people read it

[enimavix]

The Bible is Not a Scientific Book.... You expect God to discuss DNA in Genesis and let Primitive people read it

I know right? So why bother believe it if it doesnt have any foundation of any explanation? Good to hear that you're calling people reading bible primitive. Kudos.

[SioDenz]

I know right? So why bother believe it if it doesnt have any foundation of any explanation? Good to hear that you're calling people reading bible primitive. Kudos.

The Bible saying there is a GOD who created US - is a kind of Foundation. WHICH Your science cannot Explain. So why should i base my Belief on a MEDIUM that Scientist Even AGREE that they cannot EXPLAIN everything?


Primitive in the area of SCIENCE like DNA or Mircrobes etc etc... Thats Why GOD explain the Bible that way because he knows the level of understanding people in that times have. Proof that there is an Intelligent being behind it.

Unlike your science that will conclude things even if the dont have any Conclusive evidence yet, Saying that we came from apes but still Searching for the MISSING LINK

[enimavix]

The Bible saying there is a GOD who created US - is a kind of Foundation. WHICH Your science cannot Explain. So why should i base my Belief on a MEDIUM that Scientist Even AGREE that they cannot EXPLAIN everything?


Primitive in the area of SCIENCE like DNA or Mircrobes etc etc... Thats Why GOD explain the Bible that way because he knows the level of understanding people in that times have. Proof that there is an Intelligent being behind it.

Unlike your science that will conclude things even if the dont have any Conclusive evidence yet, Saying that we came from apes but still Searching for the MISSING LINK

As much as I want to argue with ya, no point. I would've believed if your Bible explained who GOD is, where he came from and what is he?

I know there are a lot of questions unanswered and it doesn't take a day to find that answer unlike the Bible, who explained things out of the blue.

[SioDenz]

As much as I want to argue with ya, no point. I would've believed if your Bible explained who GOD is, where he came from and what is he?

I know there are a lot of questions unanswered and it doesn't take a day to find that answer unlike the Bible, who explained things out of the blue.

OUT of the BLUE, r u HIGH?

The Bible has the answer for all the MOST IMPORTANT questions about LIFE:
-ORIGIN
-PURPOSE
-MORALITY
-DESTINY

SCIENCE dont even have the slightest idea how to answer that...

Theres also no point arguing with you because YOU dont even have a SOLID foundation of your belief. If i will as you - CAN science explain everything for it to be the basis of our belief? your answer would be the reason to stop arguing

[silentnuker]

There's nothing wrong if we came from ape. It's already proven by science.

Asa dapita ang na-prove bai? hahaha...I don't mean to offend you but you seem to not understand the meaning of
what we call "Scientific Theory"....you can google what a "Theory" means.

I am not against science by the way...I am a lover of science since I was a kid.

But I believe in the Bible and I also believe that GOD transcends all "Scientific Laws" established
now, even those that will be established yet by man's finite knowledge.

Peace...

[noy]

There's nothing wrong if we came from ape. It's already proven by science.

i didn't know theories can now be considered as FACTS. Lol

[foxit]

Depende ra jd na...pero as for me na hard core catholic, i believe in God na cya ang creator jd sa tanan including us humans... and He created us in His own image and likeness...
Scientist spent their lives proving what we Christians believe is wrong.

[noy]

the Bible states that God made the first human from dust. this could mean a very long natural process as dust could've represented nature or earth in itself.
God could have either used the Dust to man process in an instant or the long natural process suggested by Scientific studies which is the evolution of species.
after all He is God and is not restricted to Human perception. besides, the Bible does not have a special note on it that everything should be taken literally.
but with the advancement of Science, we then know now that Genesis creation accounts are not to be taken literally.

personally, i believe in the possibility of evolution as far as Scientific studies in the physical creation of the Human Body is concerned
but not the human soul as a product of evolution.
the time God breathe on Adam was the creation of the Human Soul which also was the time that man began to be rational and wise.
hence the first Human being. the predecessors of the modern man or Adam were not really humans.
'cause being human is being able to love, respect, understand, be rational and reasonable and can make choices.. which are the very image and likeness of God.

The Bible does not contradict Science as Miracles to Nature.
pong pa ni St. Augustine, Miracles are not contrary to nature but only to what we know about nature.

the thought that out of what we perceived to be random was able to produce extreme specifics
is already a miracle in itself.