Originally Posted by
lespaulibanez
What the"flac" is this all about? He he he.
Today i AB'ed the MP3 and FLAC audio formats by listening to Diana Krall live in Paris East of the Sun west of the Moon.
By AB'ing, it is more accurate and you can readily discern the differences as you don't have to stop and start each time you compare the sounds. It is actually a blind test so there is no way that one can say which is which. It is just on the title that you can determine which is which thereafter.
I seem not to hear any differences between the two. By difference, i mean night and day something that you can readily notice and say its worth the additional bytes it carries. My brothers did athe blind test too and could not discern any differences at all.
So what is it all about the hullabaloo on this FLAC? Can you guys really tell the difference between the two?
So what formats are you using and why?
Digital music, in its raw form from the recording studio is in MQS(Mastering Quality Sound) format, this is then converted to WAV format to be able to be written to CDs. WAV format are one of the the clearest, purest and most complete data, but the file is very large and due to limited storage in computer disks and DAPs, some guys found a way to compress WAV and created the MP3 format, this reduces the file size significantly. problem is MP3 compression results to some data being lost, so most of the time the quality is not that good, only enough for you to discern the sound. FLAC format is developed so that WAV can be compressed without any data being lost. however file size is still large but still significantly smaller than WAV. and due to storage capacity improvements, you can now store hundreds of FLAC songs on your player. with regards to audible difference, it depends on the type of MP3 compression. some files are compressed at a bit rate of 128 and 256 kbps which is the norm around 10-15 yrs ago and still very common now, if you compare this to FLAC, night and day dyud ang difference, but MP3 has also improved and now has 320 kbps which is now good enough for most people, difference is barely noticable unless you have a "Golden Ear". but being Audiophiles, cyempre adto dyud tas FLAC, I myself am not comfortable knowing that the sound im listening to is not "complete". also when you use an audiophile-grade headphone powered by a good amp, when you can really hear the details, kana klaro dyud kaayo no contest ang MP3.
me all my music are FLAC, but i convert all of them to AIFF format so i can load them into my ipod. they are both technically the same except that AIFF comes from Apple and FLAC is open-source, and apple does not play FLAC.