Sharia Law in Belgium a Scary Possibility

[bleedingboi]

---

In the states we have a growing problem with muslim radicals. slowly but surely they have more privileges than any other religion in the US. the police can search a christian church without any repercussions if they have warrants to prove something is wrong with it. but if you search a MOSQUE even with a warrant every muslim in the world would condemn the people who conducted the legal search.

this is not all about oil now... its total domination of one religion over the other and a total domination of the world.

do some research... piece all the things that's happening to the world right now. look at what radical islam is doing in each and every country and you will know what they are trying to do to the world.

France is taking a step further.
Islamophobia has risen to an alarming rate of 42%!
Former president Nicholas Sarkozy and the law banning the wearing of face-covering Islamic veils." They are also limiting the number of Mosques being built within any area.

All of this started because of the killings of 7 people, including a young rabbi and three Jewish children by an al-Qaeda-linked French gunman.

[M.A.D.]

Those radicals immigrating into EU states are usually of the less educated, and less financially capable type. What puzzles me is that why are some governments actually tolerating these types of people to hold activities that are a danger to the security of the state. Could this be a plan to condition the minds of the general population so that a war against muslims would receive unanimous approval from the populace?

The citizens of the state who want the status quo before this all happened should do something.

[KlaytoN]

Sharia in Belgium? That won't happen anytime soon. The most probable scenario is they might adapt Shariah that is similar to PD 1083 signed by Marcos in 1977. These are rather personal laws that will govern Muslims alone. Should there be any conflict between and among the Madhahib schools of law, the constitution of Belgium and public interest shall prevail. In our case, we already have the mild Shariah for more than 30 years now and so far it has served the interests of our muslim brothers..

Ang nakahadlok raman in my pov, kining "radical Islam" or "Islamic Fundamentalism". It's somewhat the same with fundamentalism of other religions and the common denominator is INTOLERANCE. Pero based on recent events like the ouster and arrest of Pres Morsi (Muslim Brotherhood) of Egypt, it seems the general Muslim public do not want fundamentalism to rule their lives.

[joshua259]

France is taking a step further.
Islamophobia has risen to an alarming rate of 42%!
Former president Nicholas Sarkozy and the law banning the wearing of face-covering Islamic veils." They are also limiting the number of Mosques being built within any area.

All of this started because of the killings of 7 people, including a young rabbi and three Jewish children by an al-Qaeda-linked French gunman.

We can't blame the french cause religion is the most scary opponent you'll ever find.

This is the quote i wrote...

Not all MUSLIMS are TERRORISTS but ALL TERRORISTS are MUSLIMS. Not all MUSLIMS are TERRORISTS, but all MUSLIMS live by Sharia Law. Now all MUSLIMS are TERRORISTS but ALL MOSQUES are funded and approved by the MUSLIM Brotherhood. Not all MUSLIMS are TERRORISTS but the MUSLIM Brotherhood fund all if not most all TERRORIST acts around the world. Not all MUSLIMS are TERRORISTS but all mosques are used for recruitments of radical MUSLIMS to fight against infidels. Not all MUSLIMS are TERRORISTS but ALL most if not all Mosques preach hate towards America and Infidels.

They use religion to justify their cause.

[joshua259]

Those radicals immigrating into EU states are usually of the less educated, and less financially capable type. What puzzles me is that why are some governments actually tolerating these types of people to hold activities that are a danger to the security of the state. Could this be a plan to condition the minds of the general population so that a war against muslims would receive unanimous approval from the populace?

The citizens of the state who want the status quo before this all happened should do something.

It's hard because they would cry out for HUMAN RIGHTS and RELIGIOUS RIGHTS. I don't believe this people are less educated nor less financially capable. They know how to use the system and they try to take advantage of the loopholes of other countries. Then they commit acts of violence to justify that their MUSLIM BROTHERS are being oppressed and why they are less fortunate than others.

[M.A.D.]

The probability of that happening is higher in a demographic comprising mostly of uneducated and unskilled immigrants. It is the easiest and most natural way they can think of in order to get to what they want quick: to be assimilated and to have the same if not better privileges from their counterparts who have earned it.

People say human rights are good yes, but these are the problems that plague too much liberal policies. This promotes a threat to the disappearance of the identity of a people. There are many examples where excess liberalism has adversely changed the political and physical landscape of any nation that adopts its principles.

It's hard because they would cry out for HUMAN RIGHTS and RELIGIOUS RIGHTS. I don't believe this people are less educated nor less financially capable. They know how to use the system and they try to take advantage of the loopholes of other countries. Then they commit acts of violence to justify that their MUSLIM BROTHERS are being oppressed and why they are less fortunate than others.

[bleedingboi]

We can't blame the french cause religion is the most scary opponent you'll ever find.

This is the quote i wrote...

Not all MUSLIMS are TERRORISTS but ALL TERRORISTS are MUSLIMS. Not all MUSLIMS are TERRORISTS, but all MUSLIMS live by Sharia Law. Now all MUSLIMS are TERRORISTS but ALL MOSQUES are funded and approved by the MUSLIM Brotherhood. Not all MUSLIMS are TERRORISTS but the MUSLIM Brotherhood fund all if not most all TERRORIST acts around the world. Not all MUSLIMS are TERRORISTS but all mosques are used for recruitments of radical MUSLIMS to fight against infidels. Not all MUSLIMS are TERRORISTS but ALL most if not all Mosques preach hate towards America and Infidels.

They use religion to justify their cause.

I agree bro. Dba ikaw man tong na-deploy sa Afghanistan ug Iraq?

Is it true nga these radicals strap TNT's to children and women and put them in the streets, in front of Humvees and Abrams so the Americans and NATO can't proceed to pass?

[Gwapito.com]

LaBelleza that is good to look at on paper. But it all remains as an ideology, a utopia that is hard to be followed. There will always be those minority of extremist, little they maybe in numbers, but DEADLY they are. Just look at the last video, these minority of radicals in the Muslim world are forcing Sharia.

Look at the Middle East countries, never ending civil war. Just take a peek at the places in the Philippines where Sharia Law is practised, it's a security threat.

Just look at Lebanon, although there's no official Sharia Law implementation, but when the growth of Islam in that country superseded that of the Christians, it resulted to chaos. Followers of Islam force their and execute their Sharia Law to all their citizens including the infidels.

Qur'an 5:51:
O you who have believed, do not take the Jews and the Christians as allies. They are [in fact] allies of one another. And whoever is an ally to them among you - then indeed, he is [one] of them. Indeed, Allah guides not the wrongdoing people.

I wish...I just wish some of us would understand what Shari'ah is first rather than just focusing on the penal code and basing our opinions on ignorance. No country practices full Sharia and just because one country practices this or that law, it doesn't necessarily make it Sharia Law.

I wont blame media entirely as even some "born Muslims" are just ignorant of their own religion and sending out false info. I'll let you in on a little info that you may not know: Sharia does not force you to adopt the Muslim way. The proof is right there in the Quran (chapter 2, verse 256)
There shall be no compulsion in [acceptance of] the religion. The right course has become clear from the wrong. So whoever disbelieves in Taghut and believes in Allah has grasped the most trustworthy handhold with no break in it. And Allah is Hearing and Knowing.

*Taghut means "to rebel".

[<SMILE>]

So the lack of knowledge about Islam resulting in the lack of intellect is the main cause why some Muslims became so violent,
or am I wrong in deciphering some of the posts here. If I am correct what about the well educated Osama Bin Laden.

[joshua259]

The probability of that happening is higher in a demographic comprising mostly of uneducated and unskilled immigrants. It is the easiest and most natural way they can think of in order to get to what they want quick: to be assimilated and to have the same if not better privileges from their counterparts who have earned it.

People say human rights are good yes, but these are the problems that plague too much liberal policies. This promotes a threat to the disappearance of the identity of a people. There are many examples where excess liberalism has adversely changed the political and physical landscape of any nation that adopts its principles.

The United States right now is the perfect example of too much liberalism.

- - - Updated - - -

Qur'an 5:51:
O you who have believed, do not take the Jews and the Christians as allies. They are [in fact] allies of one another. And whoever is an ally to them among you - then indeed, he is [one] of them. Indeed, Allah guides not the wrongdoing people.

This is the reason why no matter who you are as a MUSLIM... You are a potential enemy to every religion or to the people who do not believe in any religion just like me.

I agree bro. Dba ikaw man tong na-deploy sa Afghanistan ug Iraq?

Is it true nga these radicals strap TNT's to children and women and put them in the streets, in front of Humvees and Abrams so the Americans and NATO can't proceed to pass?

This is all true... but it depends on which area of the world you are. in iraq it was a big problem and they use RETARDED children to be suicide bombers. we can't shoot women and children and even the men now if we can't have positive identification of the suicide vests they are wearing.