Kinsa jud imo gituohan kung diin jud tah gikan, ang Bible or Science?

[slabdans]

---

OT -basta ako gikan kos trabaho karon...padung napud ko videokehan mag tagay mi sabado baya ron

[<SMILE>]

sometimes magtuo ka nga sakto imong gibuhat but if imohang tan-awon ug maayo dili diay.. scare tactic manang anaon ta sa atong ginikanan nga naay momo and it will emulate all throughout our lives, dili na hinuon ta morisgo kay mahadlokon kaayo ta nga naay bati nga mahitabo.. dili man cguro na maayo nga hadlukon nimo ang tawo esp ang bata para lang moduol nimo or motuo sa imong gusto nga ipatuo niya, kaluoy sad sa bata, kong mao na we are being selfish kay atong gi push ang idea sa iyang utok kay kabaw baya ta nga ang bata dali ra patuohon, it dont have to be that way..

no matter kong unsa ka maayo motudlo sa usa ka tawo, as long as i open up niya ang idea about hell and burning in hell forever mahadlok jud na ang bata, maihap rman sad ang kanang maayo motudlo ug bata, kasagaran dili kaayo talented bahin ana, bati pata motudlo ato pjud hadlukon ang bata, mosamot na hinuon.. pwede rman nto matudloan ang bata about kindness without opening up the heaven and hell topic.. im dont wanna sound condescending im just saying there are better options..

Same as the laws of the land
there is the so called life sentence
and in some country even the death penalty.
It's not actually an intimidation but a regulation against
erroneous doings.

[Xian120]

Same as the laws of the land
there is the so called life sentence
and in some country even the death penalty.
It's not actually an intimidation but a regulation against
erroneous doings.

I dont know why deciding to think rationally is erroneous..

[<SMILE>]

I dont know why deciding to think rationally is erroneous..

I think,
it depends if it is acceptable to those
who you wish would share your thoughts.

[BanshEe]

Both.. they're complementary to each other.

[roi :)]

for me, both jud.

[Xian120]

I think,
it depends if it is acceptable to those
who you wish would share your thoughts.

regardless of who you are sitting in front of, it is never erroneous to think..
doing things that are morally unacceptable, that is erroneous, but thinking rationally? i dont think so.

[<SMILE>]

regardless of who you are sitting in front of, it is never erroneous to think..
doing things that are morally unacceptable, that is erroneous, but thinking rationally? i dont think so.

Do you think that your senses are enough to justify your rationality.
are you sure about that?

[Xian120]

Do you think that your senses are enough to justify your rationality.
are you sure about that?

and do you think yours is also enough to justify your claim and know what is the ultimate truth?

[<SMILE>]

and do you think yours is also enough to justify your claim and know what is the ultimate truth?

Yes it's enough,
and you could not disprove it either.