3rd bridge between Mactan, Cebu expected to help ease traffic jam

[prukutung]

---

pushing this project will put more pressure sa Lapu-Lapu para tarungon na ilang mga dalan. Agree jud ko anang mga tricycle nga samuk kaau. Gamay pa kaau ang dalan naa pana sila mga hawod kaau. Bogo pajud kaau ang mga detour diha sa Lapu-Lapu.. paita diha lugara..

[Ferrari 430 Scuderia]

kanindot duol na ang duha ka sm para namo. hehehehe, maytag madayon jd ni kay ang mo agi ug lapu lapu tuyuon jd ug agi sa mandaue mao nay makadag dugay, pwede rpd mag bike cost cutting. hehe

[dbalagosa]

naa ko mga na dungog na istorya2x bahin ana sa Gaisano Capital Lapu2x.

ang mga strikto na enforcer kay nangahurot na dao ug pang pusil. Mao nisamot ka gubot didto dapita.

[hobie]

Nindot gyud na plano but naay one detail nakalimtan,
Kana na area kay ana mo agi ang mga barko esp. ang mga high rise na cargo vessel.
And since Cebu port also caters to international ships, murag lisod mahitabo na nga bridge or they have to make a very high bridge.

[jeremiahjay]

Nindot gyud na plano but naay one detail nakalimtan,
Kana na area kay ana mo agi ang mga barko esp. ang mga high rise na cargo vessel.
And since Cebu port also caters to international ships, murag lisod mahitabo na nga bridge or they have to make a very high bridge.

Bro basin nakalimot ka na ang two bridges is situated on the same channel..hehehe..

[vinzkie]

Wow this is nice..hope ma madayon ni ky ma tourist spot napod ni like san juanico bridge in leyte...

[alter-ego]

nice.. para dali ra accessibility sa bag-o sm diha..

[kit_cebu]

from what i remember, hobie is actually correct...
because the bridge will ultimately cross a towards pasil/mambaling part, it does need to be really high...otherwise, bigger ships can't go under it...except if they'll create a moveable bridge: Moveable bridge - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

@jeremiahjay - that is correct...2 bridges...but if you noticed, ships from manila does not cross under the 2 bridges anymore...which does back then...this is because (as far as i can remember sa news sauna) they are re-reouted to take the other side of the bridges...bale, nag-U-Turn sila...tungod man atong manga-sangit ang barko, mag-collision (thanks Trans-Asia...stufu captains), etc...

[greatoutlaw]

from what i remember, hobie is actually correct...
because the bridge will ultimately cross a towards pasil/mambaling part, it does need to be really high...otherwise, bigger ships can't go under it...except if they'll create a moveable bridge: Moveable bridge - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

@jeremiahjay - that is correct...2 bridges...but if you noticed, ships from manila does not cross under the 2 bridges anymore...which does back then...this is because (as far as i can remember sa news sauna) they are re-reouted to take the other side of the bridges...bale, nag-U-Turn sila...tungod man atong manga-sangit ang barko, mag-collision (thanks Trans-Asia...stufu captains), etc...

sakto ka bro...international cargo ships heading to the international port actually goes around mactan island avoiding the two bridges...I think this was the reason ngano naabot ta ang undersea tunnel na proposal instead sa 3rd bridge....

[ambokz]

hope this will push through, kay kaau man anang naay laing bridge.pru dapat sjud studyhan pag ayo ni nga project,kay di ni ma tabas2x ang budget pra ani,kay ang pag cemento lang dalan mga 20meters ang gitas-on,abot man gnig 4M,kni pa kha nga mo labang jud.it's a good project though.