Originally Posted by
bono
Tungod kay na sayop si Dr. Satur, maka conclude na dayon na gibayran bisan walay evidence? Instead of questioning the doctor thoroughly as to why lahi iyang findings, nghimo namn dayon ug conclusion bisan walay bases.
Dili lng unta magpataka ug storya kng walay evidence kay dghan maamong na innocente. Ang sakto na taw mghuna2 before mo abli sa iyang baba.
boss, di ba mao man na ilang gibuhat kang Ducayag, they accused him wrongly of stealing the pair of slippers which eventually resulted to his death...but now when people try to incriminate Satur because of his out-of-this-world findings about Ducayag's death (which was later proven false and inaccurate), do we have the right to question these people why they came up with such assumptions?
...at least accusing Satur (of being paid for the cover-up) will not kill him as what it did to the victim...