Our candidate has moved ahead of the perceived two leading candidates in FaceBook:
Please help our cause by
liking his Facebook page: http://www.facebook.com/navarroforcebu
and by sharing the following campaign materials with your friends:
Cebu, we have a better choice for congress! We do not have to choose between a political dynasty and a movie star!
Results 91 to 100 of 111
-
05-08-2013, 11:04 AM #91Elite Member
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Gender
- Posts
- 1,823
-
05-08-2013, 11:08 AM #92C.I.A.
- Join Date
- Mar 2013
- Gender
- Posts
- 6,157
Okay Bro,
Thanks sa info.
-
05-08-2013, 11:14 AM #93C.I.A.
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Gender
- Posts
- 2,896
Free health care is immoral.
Originally Posted by dubioz
Our candidate has moved ahead of the perceived two leading candidates in FaceBook:
Please help our cause by
liking his Facebook page: http://www.facebook.com/navarroforcebu
and by sharing the following campaign materials with your friends:
Cebu, we have a better choice for congress! We do not have to choose between a political dynasty and a movie star!
-
05-10-2013, 07:06 AM #94Elite Member
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Gender
- Posts
- 1,823
Bro, health care is a democratic right.
Do not deny your fellow Filipinos their democratic right to health care! Do not leave our health to businessmen and the politicians they sponsor!
Make REAL UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE a reality in this country!
Vote for Don Navarro, No. 5 on the ballot this Monday, May 13, 2013!
Originally Posted by emow
-
05-10-2013, 08:38 AM #95C.I.A.
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Gender
- Posts
- 2,896
It is not a right, because it confers an obligation on other people to pay for the exercise of that "right." Does my right to express mean that government should pay my medium of expression? Originally Posted by dubioz
-
05-10-2013, 09:07 AM #96Elite Member
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Gender
- Posts
- 1,823
Bro, nobody dies if you cannot pay for the medium of expression.
Originally Posted by emow
-
05-10-2013, 09:22 AM #97C.I.A.
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Gender
- Posts
- 2,896
irrelevant... the issue is the legitimacy of a RIGHT, as you are trying to imply against the true concept of a RIGHT. Originally Posted by dubioz
-
05-10-2013, 09:24 AM #98Elite Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
- Gender
- Posts
- 1,343
Ugh, promoting a society of handout-dependents!! Ugh!
-
05-10-2013, 09:36 AM #99C.I.A.
- Join Date
- Mar 2013
- Gender
- Posts
- 6,157
Total liberty for politicians is a good means of promoting self interest and greed.
-
05-10-2013, 09:48 AM #100C.I.A.
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Gender
- Posts
- 2,896
IF Right to Life means that nobody has the moral authority to take away your life or impede your enjoyment of it, then the interpretation of Right to Health should be read the same, nobody has the moral authority to take away your health or impede your pursuit of health. Why does your Right to Health means that somebody should pay for your exercise of your health?
Just to be very clear, let us make an extreme example to fully understand the folly of your interpretation... Supposed, there are only three of you left in the island, can your version of right to health exists? apparently it can't.
why?
1. Nobody else is there to provide health care, unless one of you is a medical professional.
2. Even if one of you is a medical professional, can it be morally right to say to him " Take care of me, i have right to health!"
3. Since you are conferring an obligation on the other person without his permission, isn't that a violation of his liberties?
4. Suppose two of you voted to have the third one take care of you both, isn't that slavery?
Reply With Quote Advertisement
Similar Threads |
|
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
|