Help....

[junnel1991]

---

Mga master,,patabang ko ninyo if asa ako paliton na lens puhon na telephoto,naglibog nako,..unsa man ang ika.recommend ninyo mga master, Canon 70-200mm f/4L IS USM or Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG OS HSM?
ayaw lang nang Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM ky dli ko ka afford..
salamat...

[Ferrari 430 Scuderia]

ill choose sigma or kung pwede tigom nalang gamay nalang kuwang para 2.8 is usm sa canon

[junnel1991]

ill choose sigma or kung pwede tigom nalang gamay nalang kuwang para 2.8 is usm sa canon

dli lang sa ko anang canon f2.8 is usm sir ky dili jud ko ka afford ana kay student pman gud ako budget..salamat sir..

[kwynen]

sa duha,para naku ky sigma

[burikoy12]

I suggest you search for reviews of both lenses, apili pod ug tan aw ug sample shots aron makompara jud nimo.

[imbakaau]

base on my experience, I was never satisfied with a 70-200 f4 before, I think it's better if you go for the sigma 2.8, then later on Canon 70-200 2.8 na

[arisarnado]

i-try ug abot nalang ang 70-200mm f/2.8 (non-IS)... sulit ni xa.

[P-Chan]

para asa diay nah gamit nimo TS?

[foldofus]

i suggest the canon sir, f4 is ok as long as you know how to use it properly with the right ISO and shutter settings. canon is always better. plus its L. whats the purpose, if for portraiture or mdoel shoots lang get a prime lens instead, get a 50mm or an 85mm instead.

the sigmas body coating tends to wear off (unless the new version) plus review always favors the canon lens.

if money is an issue a prime is better, its more affordable. but if your an earning photog then price is of no deal.=p otherwise, lets get whats practical to your genre of photography.

if for sniping chicks, get the 55-250. its a sharp lens as long as good lighting is adequate.=p

then again depende on your purpose.=p

[ad_dur]

i up lang tika TS . . . . .