Peeps,
allow me to share my personal review on my previous gaming rig... had changed the mobo to ASRock Fatal1ty Z77 Professional already. This review is for the GPU...
HW Set-up:
CPU: i3-2120 @ 3.3 GHz (all cores are active and HT enabled)
GPU: Inno3D GTX 660 Ti iChiLL 2GB Factory OC... GPU clock@ 1020 MHz (1098 MHz boost) & Memory frequency @ 6212 MHz.
Mem: Avexir Core Series DDR3 1333 2 x 4GB (8GB)
Mobo: ASRock H61DE/Sl
HDD: WD Caviar Blue 320GB SATA 2
PSU: Corsair TX 750W
Cooling System: Corsair H50
Monitor: Acer H274HL (27" LED backlit)
DVD: Pioneer
Broadband connection: 10 Mbps
Nvidia driver version: 306.97
Games: BF3 Premium Edition
Settings: Ultra
No. of players: 64 max
Maps: Large... auto random selection during online game play
Resolution: 1920 x 1080p
Frame Capture Application: FRAPS ver 3.4.1
Capture time per test: 300 seconds
Number of test: 60x
Here's for the running average FPS during the entire length of the testing... had just removed the Min and Max FPS data points for this chart.
Average FPS Chart...
Min & Max Chart...
I had chosen to obtain the numbers from the actual online game play @ 64 players on large map so that the read outs will be from the actual gaming experience. For me, the frame per second (FPS) is acceptable. The minimum FPS that was obtained during the whole duration of the test was at 16 fps but, I can not distinguish or pinpoint where did it happen during the gaming time. The average FPS was running above 50 FPS. The actual gaming experience on BF3 at Ultra settings on 1920 x 1080p is good though.
I'll get another round of review for the ASRock Fatal1ty Z77 Professional mobo if there's a slight improvement on the actual game play. There's a big improvement in Heaven benchmark though... I'll upgrade to a slightly powerful CPU later. I'll show the results once this plan will be materialized.
By the way, this review is transparent, the min and max FPS were shown. Most of the online reviews doesn't show the min FPS. They just don't like to show it I guess since it can change the readers perception. They did not even explain their test methodology on how do they get those numbers. Dips are real in the game... Anyway, you've got this one as transparent as a glass.
Please share your review also... Salamat...
Additional lang ni na chart for quick reference... had added the result of my benchmark analysis. had removed all the spikes on my benchmark to normalize the data. cut off was set at 30 to 90 FPS. all uncontrolled factors that made those spikes were removed in the chart below. it's a normal thing to do in any eng'g analysis. the test/ benchmark methodology used is not the same though since we don't know how many data points did Tom's obtained during their testing. I'll get some data for apple-to-apple comparison after some time. Here's the link from Tom's Hardware review...
Benchmark Results: Battlefield 3 : GeForce GTX 660 Ti Review: Nvidia's Trickle-Down Keplernomics
By the way, the hardware used by Tom's during their benchmark was an enthusiast level... capture nako for your quick reference...