this is hilarious. i dont understand why you all take it out on "man" authors. all books in the world are produced by man, not animals or insects. that doesn't really mean they're all wrong. all you're doing is trying to weasle out of defending your most holiest of holies sacred book.
springfield, honestly, i dont understand any of the sentences you've written. they don't make sense, at all...
but let me just ask one question...
how do you decide which is literal in the bible and which is not? theres a really fine line between em. i've had an argument about this with my re-ed teacher, and she folded, she weasled out...![]()



and the holy spirit? i dont care about the holy spirit, i dont even think it exist. the fact is, if you had "a deeper understanding" of your faith, then you should stand by it and defend it, no matter what. you are a christian arent you? otherwise you would be a "theist". a person who believes in a god but is not dependent or connected to any organized religion...
