Page 49 of 51 FirstFirst ... 39464748495051 LastLast
Results 481 to 490 of 504
  1. #481

    Default Re: True Age of the Universe - Biblical Fact - From Age 0 to Jesus


    Your beliefs are stupid, normal catholic dogma is bad enough, this is idiotic.

  2. #482

    Default Re: True Age of the Universe - Biblical Fact - From Age 0 to Jesus

    ka harsh pud nimu bai oi ...you need some love brother!! hahaha

  3. #483

    Default Re: True Age of the Universe - Biblical Fact - From Age 0 to Jesus

    kuwang rani sila ug gakos bro.....

  4. #484

    Default Re: True Age of the Universe - Biblical Fact - From Age 0 to Jesus

    aw...na hala! group hug!

  5. #485


    Why everything you've been told about evolution is wrong

    The story, still sometimes repeated in creationist circles, goes like this: it is the 1960s, at Nasa's Goddard Space Flight Centre in Maryland, and a team of astronomers is using cutting-edge computers to recreate the orbits of the planets, thousands of years in the past. Suddenly, an error message flashes up. There's a problem: way back in history, one whole day appears to be missing.

    The scientists are baffled, until a Christian member of the team dimly recalls something and rushes to fetch a Bible. He thumbs through it until he reaches the Book of Joshua, chapter 10, in which Joshua asks God to stop the world for . . . "about a full day!" Uproar in the computer lab. The astronomers have happened upon proof that God controls the universe on a day-to-day basis, that the Bible is literally true, and that by extension the "myth" of creation is, in fact, a reality. Darwin was wrong – according to another creationist rumour, he'd recanted on his deathbed, anyway – and here, at last, is scientific evidence!

    Why everything you've been told about evolution is wrong | Science | The Guardian

    - - - Updated - - -

    There are logical reasons apart from Scripture's direct testimony to reject the theory of evolution and accept creation and a Creator.

    Can we prove that evolution is false without using the Bible? Certainly we can! Evolution is a scientific theory that stands or falls on the physical evidence. In fact, one can be an atheist, a person who doesn't believe in God, and still not believe in evolution!
    Charles Darwin's theory of evolution, as taught at school, is a biological explanation of how creatures have supposedly "evolved" or developed progressively through natural selection and variation (now known as mutation) over eons of time from the tiny cell to the largest creatures on earth today. What is taught in classrooms is not mere micro evolution—small changes within a species—but macro evolution, the change from one type of creature to another quite distinct life form.

    Prove Evolution Is False - Even Without the Bible - Vertical Thought | United Church of God

  6. #486
    dont jump into conclusions, because a certain blogger told you so that dont mean we take his word as it is..

    i advise that you study and understand evolution first before claiming any conclusions.. it's not the kind of subject that you mop under the rug..

  7. #487
    Quote Originally Posted by Xian120 View Post
    dont jump into conclusions, because a certain blogger told you so that dont mean we take his word as it is..

    i advise that you study and understand evolution first before claiming any conclusions.. it's not the kind of subject that you mop under the rug..
    Same as the THEORY of Evolution nga imung nahibaloan karun, You did NOT PERSONALLY experimented it - You Just Read and learned it from Someone Else - Mostly Internet.

    So dont Jump into conclusion sad

  8. #488
    Mc TAGGART ON THE ILLUSION OF TIME

    John Ellis McTaggart (3 September 1866 – 18 January 1925) was a fellow and lecturer in philosophy at
    Trinity College, Cambridge UK. He is best known today for his work “The Unreality of Time” (190.
    McTaggart's expressed the view that the way we perceive time is an illusion. He described events as A and B
    series in time. The A series consisted of events in future present and past moving along the time line toward
    the past a constantly changing position. This series basically is the so called flow of time. In his B series he
    talks of fixed relationship of events as earlier and later. Death of a person is always later then their birth. The B
    series can also be called the arrow or direction of time. He argued that the changing A series is more essential
    to time than a fixed relationship of earlier and later therefore our perception of time is an illusion. His most
    interesting observation however may be that historical events have the same time characteristic as fictional
    stories. For example fictional events written by various authors, as well as past historical events have in them,
    the earlier and the later as well as the past the present and the future, thus suggesting that past really is more
    like memory of events and does not exist anymore than the imagination of a writer. The above point becomes
    clearer when we compare past present and future to events that are recorded on devices like tapes, CDs,
    DVDs, and computer hard drives.

    WHAT IS TIME

  9. #489
    Quote Originally Posted by SioDenz View Post
    Same as the THEORY of Evolution nga imung nahibaloan karun, You did NOT PERSONALLY experimented it - You Just Read and learned it from Someone Else - Mostly Internet.

    So dont Jump into conclusion sad
    I may not experimented it, or poke my eye into some microscope but i do know enough to reach certain personal objectives..

  10. #490
    Quote Originally Posted by Xian120 View Post
    I may not experimented it, or poke my eye into some microscope but i do know enough to reach certain personal objectives..
    You mean Personal Belief?

    know enough? you already admitted not doing it yourself, reading it from someone else and then you will say you know enough?

    When you believed about Dinosaurs existing millions of years ago, coming from a person who based his principles on Physical Scientific Evidence - Which part or your OWN knowledge or your ' i do know enough' to support that your belief is True? Did you DO Something else by yourself to support your belief? OR IS all your proof Not yours and you Just copied it from Someone?

  11.    Advertisement

Similar Threads

 
  1. Who is the Great Architect of the Universe
    By IadnaH OD AnanaeL in forum Spirituality & Occult - OLDER
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 06-17-2009, 03:39 PM
  2. Size of the Universe
    By pastry_chef in forum Science
    Replies: 51
    Last Post: 05-28-2009, 04:54 PM
  3. Size of the Universe
    By pastry_chef in forum Spirituality & Occult - OLDER
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 05-04-2009, 11:40 AM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-13-2009, 02:09 PM
  5. Our understanding of the Universe is about to change
    By cosplay in forum General Discussions
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 09-03-2008, 08:27 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
about us
We are the first Cebu Online Media.

iSTORYA.NET is Cebu's Biggest, Southern Philippines' Most Active, and the Philippines' Strongest Online Community!
follow us
#top