The guy probably has a lot of things to hide and prefers to keep it that way, otherwise he would have been all over the news getting back at the president for such blatant disrespect. The president likely knows of these and could have used the government resources to expose, prosecute and jail if necessary, but is keeping his aces for reasons only he knows. Either way, the hiding and holding of information and resorting to 'the buzz' style of delivering messages is outright wrong and unbecoming of a President. But what else is new...
Thumbs up, thumbs down for Aquino
dri mo basa kay klaro kaau wala mo kasabot ngano na in.ato c pinoy. beside salig kay moment to sa abs-cbn dili nalang sila pwede masultian unsa ilang sayop.?
unsa may bill ni Noli nga sila lang, he alone, ang ng buhat?
aber, aber?
kung gustohon ni noynoy mgpa garpar, pwede ra gyud sya mo sabay sa uso.. mo co-author dayon.. unya credit dayon ang passage sa bill niya ug sa uban author..
kita ka sa katong listing sa bill ni Noli na passed into law? unsa may significant effect ato?
wala nko gi-claim nga walay gamit ang na pasar nga co-author bills ni Noli.. but that ain't significant enough...
kita ka sa mga proposed bills ni noynoy? ug ngano man wala gyud na pasar sa congresso? kay daghan fellow congressman ma apekehan.. mao wala gyud na pasar nga balaod..
ay sush, kung numero ang inyong gauge unsa kamaayo ang legislator, might as well praise Noli for his 500+ sponsored bills for renaming of streets, praise-kiss-ass resolutions, .. and many more boo-boo...
sa panahon chairman c noynoy sa senate committee on local government, sya ang pinaka nangusog nga babagan ang pg tunga (half) sa Camarines para hatagan ug kaugalingon district c Datu Arroyo.. ug active ni siya sa budget deliberations.. ang iyang role gi-play was of a fiscalizer... dili padaghanay ug na sponsor na bills..
style-la...
Noynoy focused on the fiscalizing role of a legislator. He felt that there were already too many laws, and good ones at that, but they seemingly lacked proper implementation.
You should realize that people are capable of critically thinking whether the president did the right thing or not. There are a lot of circumstances behind the incident and one can choose which to highlight and which to ignore. What you just read is Ellen Tordesillas' opinion which is subjective and no different from the opinions that have been expressed here. If you wish to influence the thoughts of others who may not agree with you in this forum, articulate your own opinion and let others challenge or support you. This incident is not about whose 'moment' it was, but rather if what transpired is justifiable or not. There the disagreements arise, but let us just respect each other's opinion and not take things personally.
faux pas, that was... let it be.. in anycase, who decides what is socially acceptable or not...? wearing skimpy shorts 10 years ago is too much of a taboo.. but what now? point is, no one has the monopoly of deciding what is socially acceptable,. what is acceptable many years ago might not be acceptable today.. vice versa..
everyone seems to agree that the message (to the media) was right.. then why so much fuss.. ehehehehe...
or we are just too critical due to our personal favorites and hates...
Well, for me the general message of the President is to tame NEGATIVISM in all forms of media. Noli De Castro was simply cited as a person who shows such acts. And, in general.... I still applaud the President for doing it. Besides, our media has been abusing the statement "Freedom of Speech." The President can also exercise his "freedom of speech" to highlight what media has been wrongly doing.
And to make this thread intesting...Istoryans..read on this news article below:
ABS-CBN has cautioned De Castro even before Aquino’s critique– insider
MANILA, Philippines — Even before President Benigno Aquino III made his biting comments against one of the country’s most popular news anchors, ABS-CBN Broadcasting Corp. itself has been upset about broadcaster Noli De Castro’s habit of injecting his opinion during the prime time news telecast. It, however, chose not to reprimand its iconic anchor but merely cautioned him about showing his leanings in the delivery of news.
A network insider, who refused to be identified for lack of clearance to speak in behalf of ABS-CBN News, said that De Castro and his anchors were allowed to give their insights (to give more context to the news) but not their personal opinion as part of “TV Patrol’s” re-launch two years ago.
“It’s supposed to be a freewheeling banter, which was adopted from the ‘Pulso’ segment in the old TV Patrol. But it was made clear that their comments should only be made at the end and not during the newscast,” said the source.
There were instances when De Castro strayed from the scripted questions and made snide remarks or facial expressions during live reports and the source said De Castro had been cautioned but not penalized by his department superiors.
On the news coverage regarding the surge in passenger arrivals at the Ninoy Aquino International Airport’s Terminal 3, which was cited by the President in his speech, the source said the news bosses were also surprised why De Castro had to cite the terrible state of NAIA-1 during the report. “It might be a fact that NAIA 1 is a bad airport but why say it at that point of a news telecast? He could have made his opinions known in his radio program,” said the source.
The source admitted that officials of the news department were conflicted when they decided two years ago to bring back De Castro who was widely perceived as carrying a lot of baggage after spending nearly a decade in politics — from his tainted victory in the 2004 elections to his subservience to the administration of Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo to his alleged involvement in the North Rail and Globe Asiatique controversies.
“The management was aware of all the criticisms against him… His political past made his return complicated. But the management stuck with him because they believed in his sincere desire to help and serve the masses,” said the source.
Aside from his ties to the old administration, the source said that de Castro role as main news anchor was at odds with his role as radio commentator in ABS-CBN’s affiliate, DZMM. The source said the public looked to TV Patrol as the their main source of news and management was keen on keeping it free from accusations of bias.
Regina “Jing” Reyes, chief of the ABS-CBN News and Public Affairs, said that any complaints against their news reports or personnel were turned over to its in-house ombudsman for investigation. According to Reyes, there is no pending investigation of De Castro and that the management has not decided whether the President’s criticisms are enough to merit a probe.
“It’s a good and bad thing actually. It’s bad that the President himself made the criticism but it’s also good for us because it shows that we are not biased towards this administration as most of our critics claimed in our coverage of the Arroyo arrest and Corona impeachment,” said Reyes in a phone interview.
from: ABS-CBN has cautioned De Castro even before Aquino
Last edited by high_heels; 07-31-2012 at 06:14 PM.
My argument was that the president's premise that NDC did not do anything in the 6 years as VP to correct what he perceives to be wrong can equally be applied to him who was also a public servant during that same time. If he indeed took the role as a fiscalizer then, why are we faced with so many issues now?
Lain2x jud ug reaction ang mga taw sa gibuhat ni PNOY! Ang media importante kaau jud na para makahibalo ta sa mga nahitabo sa nasod. Pero nasubraan nasad na ka gara ang uban.. nag cge naman lang gud na silag huna2x ug ratings.. mao nang kung naay bad news.. hala sige birahan daun ug maayo.. Front Page gyud daun.. Si Noli gara na kaayo karun! pero sa katung naglingkod pa siya sa iyang truno.. sa mga gibuhat ni GMA hilum kaau siya!! purya buyag.. unya unsa man kono ang maayo nga iyang nabuhat nga nag sige raman na siyag tago..
Similar Threads |
|