Yes, I understand that face in this issue. But I think RP's best move is to strengthen ties with the U.S. without invoking the issue in S. China Sea. The highest chance for U.S. to honor its responsibilities to us is if the rest of the world, save China, will see that we have not caused provocation in any way, shape or form. Kaning style nga we look like we're proactively pulling the U.S. into the issue, it will not win us sympathy. And sympathy is what we need the most right now. TBH China knows the U.S. have been monitoring the area as they are aware of the American capabilities, they are not stupid. This kind of posturing is unnecessary and will cause adverse effects to the rest of the world's sentiment regarding this issue. Contrary to belief, most military incursions are not reported to the media.
I don't know if PNoy used the word "spy" plane or if the article itself used the word (Reuters?) But I don't like it one bit. Spying would connote that we'd be peeking into Chinese territory when in fact, we're monitoring ours. Monitoring or surveillance would suffice.
Last edited by æRLO; 07-04-2012 at 01:51 PM.
Ang Japan nga Kontra nato sauna, karon laban na sad sila sa ato-a...Everything is possible under the sun jod diay..
di pa kaayo "concrete" ang evidence nga naa gyud daghang oil diha....para mo-involve ang america...
^ ang japan naa pud sila dispute against China so they know our sentiment.
=
sa ako lang tana, kaning mga media nag exercise nalng ug restraint kay sensitive bya ni na issue. cge bya pud pa interview ni sa media si Penoy, wa nata mahims ana ang media nalang ang mo-adjust
OT: ipa dala na c jack bauer did2, e-sabotage tanan barko. gikidnap bya cya sa mga insik last time.
mawala na lng ta ani na kalibutan wla pa ni ma impas na isyu.
u said it marius
Similar Threads |
|